Re: farewell match for harbhajan>
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 11, 2013 01:20 AM
Why are you guys so much against him? Has he done anything wrong to you? he is the 10th highest wicket taker in test cricket. He is only the 3rd Indian bowler to take 400 plus test wickets. He is only the 7th bowler to take 5 wickets 25 times in test cricket, which is 2 times more then Kapil Dev. He is the only number 8 batsman to have scored two consecutive test centuries. If you do not know all these things and just hate him then s.hame on you.
Re: Re: farewell match for harbhajan>
by Pradeep Goud on Feb 11, 2013 10:39 AM
Look at the present form how many wkts he has taken in both odi's & Tests. then u will agree.
Harbhajan has become a stereo type and much predictable spin bowler who every players find easy to play. He has missed lots of matches to represent India due to his poor form. He is young and should concentrate on his own performance instead of under estimating Australian team and predict four nil victory for India against them.
I do not think, Haar Bhajan is still good enough to play even Ranji cricket. He's no more a match winner and can't take the burden on his shoulder and lead the team to win by taking wickets himself. He's only comparable with the present lot who're all "also ran" kind. `wish, the selectors look beyond half talents, bits and pieces players like Bhajji, Jaddu and Ashwin, for a promising spinner who can win the matches solely on his efforts single handedly....
harbhajan. he was dropped on eng tour? again came back. dropped during eng's home tour. again comes back. but on what performances. n if he was to b brought back then y he was dropped in the first case?
Re: Re: back onwhich performance?
by Jai Neo on Feb 10, 2013 10:22 PM
The Sardar is actually a "LEGEND in his own Mind"! REmember the line by "Dirty Harry" Clint Eastwood?
Re: back onwhich performance?
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:36 PM
Let me make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay pout of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected ion second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra beck in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies.
Re: back onwhich performance?
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:36 PM
Let me make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay pout of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected ion second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra beck in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies.
Re: Re: back onwhich performance?
by Srivatsan S on Feb 10, 2013 10:23 PM
Don't just look at wickets, if you see Sreesant in the Irani match, he did not get any wickets, but bowled exceptionally well and moved the ball both ways, bounce and troubled all the batsmat. But looking at Harbhajan bowling every mumbai playes played he very comfortably, he never troubled any batsmat and made any beaten, all his wickets are just of rash shots by batsman and the upmire's mistakes.
Re: Re: Re: back onwhich performance?
by navdeep johar on Feb 10, 2013 11:25 PM
Srivats look at ashwins wkts ag England, most of them bcoz of poor umpiring so shall he out of team.. Only result counts nothing dont speak without knowing ur stuff please
Re: Re: Re: back onwhich performance?
by taklu on Feb 11, 2013 03:07 AM
did we watch the same game?. bhaj had a great game and im sure he MUST know that he had a great game, how could he not. not only he was the pick of the bowlers of his team in both innings , he troubled the batsman like as his stats said. as soon as he got the first wicket he was a different bowler, much like his older self. his magical bounce was back (responsible for most wkts), and the turn on the final day, even on a placid track . And, no mumbai player was comfortable to bhaj with the exception of tendulkar. however, funnily he didn't attack tendulkar (the whole time just had a slip and a short leg) , while as many as 4 infielders for others.
Re: bhajjis
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:39 PM
Let me also make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay out of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected in second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra beck in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies. Hope you now get the clear picture.
Re: bhajjis
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:40 PM
Let me also make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay out of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected in second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra beck in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies. Hope you now get the clear picture.
Re: bhajjis
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:40 PM
Let me also make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay out of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected in second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin\'s tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra beck in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies. Hope you now get the clear picture.
Man who says competency is criteria for selection - with hoardes of politicians managing the BCCI .Recent good news was BCCI was fined some 55 crores .They killed ICL and punishing some of them even today .There are no indecent words in English to describe them
Re: fgd
by Neelamegham on Feb 10, 2013 06:38 PM
cannot say that suddenly. he did a good bowling in the irani match. good bounce and maybe 3-4 wickets also.
Re: fgd
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:42 PM
Indian cricket do not require people of your mentality. What do you know about his records? His performances? His never give up attitude on field? You dislike him doesn't mean he is of no use to the team.
Re: Re: Re: fgd
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 11, 2013 12:58 AM
current form? Look at what he did in the last 2 games. In semis he took 6 wickets and Irani trophy 5 wickets. So is that enough for the current form?
Re: sincere request to harbhajan
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:44 PM
Let me make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay out of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected ion second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra back in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies.
I hope you are now convinced that he has bowled well.
Re: Re: sincere request to harbhajan
by MS Dhobi on Feb 11, 2013 11:22 AM
LOLOLOL, he did not accept that he was dropped in england but made silly excuses. dont say he was out of the team for few months. how could he play champions league t20 in 2011 during the india-eng odi season if he was out for few months?
Re: sincere request to harbhajan
by Ajeet Singh on Feb 10, 2013 09:45 PM
Let me make your memory a bit strong: he was not dropped from England tour, he had cramps in stomach due to which he had to stay out of team for few months.
When England toured India, he was not in the first test match, was selected ion second test match but was allowed to bowl only 22 overs in 4 breaks, in short he was used as a part time bowler who allowed the other bowlers to change ends. he still took 2 wickets which equaled Ashwin's tally of 2 wickets in that match.
In the recently concluded match against Mumbai he took 5 wickets out of 14 that fell. In the previous match against Saurashtra he took 6 wickets and opened the attack that sent Surashtra back in pavilion in little more than 2 sessions of play.
I hope now things are bit clearer to you. There is no harm in disliking a player but to keep your eyes closed to his achievement is not only ignorance but it silly when you make your views public, which are read by people and will certainly attract replies.
I hope you are now convinced that he has bowled well.
