Common two wickets can be termed as burst are u kidding ...thats why india have a poor bowling attack when we term 2 wickets as burst that too at domestic level and start considering bowlers a good candidate for national team thats doesnt help...if that is the case even saurabh towary took 3 wickets at domestic level so in that manner his 3 wicket burst should be good enough to earn him a plae at national side..actually we have always made mockery of standards ..we should be setting higher standards something l;ine 5 wicket hauls will definately motivate the bowler and justifies his candidature for national team
Form is temporary and class is permanent, I am a firm believer in this and the return to form of Bhajji is the best example. What a time to return to form! I am sure the selectors will take this seriously and allow him a place in the team to become only the 10th Indian to play 100 tests for the country.
Even though the proactive anti-Bhajji ghroup is going to come out with all the negative thoughts but that won't make any difference this time.
Re: Form V/S Class
by Bala Kiran on Feb 08, 2013 01:12 PM
come on .. one wicket was a wrong decision and another is a typical Rohit sharma wkt where he searches for ways to get out .. with these two wkts the author thinks that Bhajji should make a comeback .. This is not a solid reason for taking him into indian team
