Discussion Board

Tendulkar sets benchmark for most international tons


Total 84 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
abraham
no. of matches
by abraham on Mar 20, 2012 11:27 AM

mr. rajneesh gupta...please compare the no. of matches in the compilation also. this will tell who is better.let sachin play till general retirement age of 60 & keep scoring.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Harish
Non Sence Comments
by Harish on Mar 20, 2012 11:13 AM  | Hide replies

Look at the India-Bangladesh Match In Ashia Cup. If any two of the Three seamers of Indiahave bowled well we could have won the match. Sachin is a Batsman and he has did his work, but what about our bowlers, if they could not take a wickets of Bangladesh batsmens then how could you blame on sachin to lose the match when he score hundred.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bijo m
Re: Non Sence Comments
by bijo m on Mar 20, 2012 11:27 AM
well said mate...and there are so many jealous people who talk rubbish..just let them bark! Its Gr8 that we have Sachin in our side...otherwise with these bunch of 'nut' bowlers Team India would have been in the 10 position always. there were time when Indians switched off the tv when Sachin got out...and I still do the same sometimes and the likes of yuvraj/kohli/gambhir/rohit.. had taught me to think otherwise now.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Truth
Re: Non Sence Comments
by Truth on Mar 20, 2012 12:29 PM
and if bangla desh bawler could bawl well tendulkar wud not have made centuriy..if tendulkar scored 147 runs in 114 ball then india cud have post 330 runs which was out of the reach....there is no place for if and but...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Happy Indian
Re: Non Sence Comments
by Happy Indian on Mar 21, 2012 06:31 AM
Well said man. If it was bowler hostile track, how was Bangladesh able to take all wickets against SL

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
abcdefgh
Re: Non Sence Comments
by abcdefgh on Mar 26, 2012 10:19 AM
mr.sachin why you are liying always. your focus was only on 100. you are playing for money and personal record and you are not for country. You are surely a selfish cricketer. that is why we can not call you a great. althoough you are the best batsman but you will never be called a great due to selfish nature. please stop liyiyng to media every time and accept the fact that we lost asia cup due to poor bowling and your selfish 100. this is what we indian feel. already you lost respect. but if you are not retiring immediately then you will lose balance respect and you will be humiliated and finally kicked out. so better take a quick decision of retiement.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Pradeep Vijayan
Brian Lara
by Pradeep Vijayan on Mar 20, 2012 10:43 AM

I dont think so Brian Lara was selfish, but his win% is far less than Sachin, which means only one thing.....the win% is as good as the team and nothing to do with SRT alone

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Seth Bhagwandas
the difference
by Seth Bhagwandas on Mar 20, 2012 10:19 AM

tendulakar had kurivila , mhatre , dodda ganesh, prasad , srinath, the man who was completly fit only in his mothers womb "ashish nehra",

    Forward  |  Report abuse
siddharth pathak
Tendulkar sets new benchmark for
by siddharth pathak on Mar 20, 2012 10:18 AM  | Hide replies

SELFISHNESS and the purely Indian idea that an individual is greater than the team

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Seth Bhagwandas
Re: Tendulkar sets new benchmark for
by Seth Bhagwandas on Mar 20, 2012 10:20 AM
what is your credentials dude , even madanlal , kapil dev , yashpal sharma think twice before talking.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ummer ha
Re: Re: Tendulkar sets new benchmark for
by ummer ha on Mar 22, 2012 11:26 AM
after playing 22 years for country still he is struggling against bangladesh if pitch was slow how he scored fast after 100. I agree 290 score was enough but why we can't score more n take bonus point

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kamal rathi
about winning
by kamal rathi on Mar 20, 2012 09:45 AM  | Hide replies

winning a match is not only in batsmens hand..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kamal rathi
Re: about winning
by kamal rathi on Mar 20, 2012 09:46 AM
if a batsmen only can make us win then all 11 players shuld be batsmen..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kamal rathi
Re: Re: about winning
by kamal rathi on Mar 20, 2012 09:46 AM
bowlers also have some resposiblity..if other teams r better coz of good bowling..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kamal rathi
Re: Re: Re: about winning
by kamal rathi on Mar 20, 2012 09:47 AM
if india doesnt hav many wins thts coz not the whole team performing..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
TEE BONE
why only his good things are highlighted.........
by TEE BONE on Mar 20, 2012 09:31 AM  | Hide replies

what about his dubious records why media does not highlight them too.....
no article from the media regarding this.......
I wrote just one negative statistics and felt the whole of country is my enemy.......
I did not write any wrong statistic.......
This shows how blind folded the people are...........


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Gopal Krishnan
SUCCESS PERCENTAGE
by Gopal Krishnan on Mar 20, 2012 09:30 AM

The above statistics clearly reveals that the player of a team that had better bowling side has registered better success rate. Look at the order Hayden, Ponting, Jayasurya, Jayawardane, Sangakara, Kallis and so on. No wonder, Tendulkar, Lara and Dravid are behind them. A look at past statistics will definitely reveal better success rate for Lloyd, Richards, Greenidge, Chappel Brothers, Zaheer Abbas, Majid Khan, Javed Miandad, Barlow, Pollock and even G.R.Vishwanath. A test is always won by the bowlers and let us admit it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 84 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message