Re: Re: Re: selfish man
by debasish datta on Mar 17, 2012 09:51 PM
nothing to say against sachin, we just want that players no matter who they are should play cricket only for one reason to make their team victorious and that is the way it should be.
Re: Re: Re: Re: selfish man
by debasish datta on Mar 17, 2012 09:56 PM
an in current situation sachin is not doing this. just think of the situation that all the Indian batsman are making 100 in every match and all the bowlers are taking wicket regularly but India is loosing every match... what is the value of such performance? it would be rather good if no bats man get century and no bowler get 5 or 10 wicket in any match but India win every match. What do u say friends?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: selfish man
by syedatjannat on Mar 17, 2012 10:19 PM
sachin scored 110 runs in 25 overs!!! this is the reason for defeat against bangladesh!!. Remember India scored over 300 runs in under 40 overs recently against quality team Sri lanka!!
Re: Re: selfish man
by Mogumbo Returns on Mar 18, 2012 05:42 AM
A vicious deal. Bangla Desh will let Sachin make a century, and India will let Bangla Desh win.
frustrated sachin fan club member, they just cant digest the fact that he made his so called historical century again Ban at the cost of team's victory
Re: ha ha ha
by Akash Pandey on Mar 17, 2012 09:37 PM
This person (Sachin) betrayed the country by scored 100 th century your as personal scores at the cost of country. Due to your slow batting rating we have losed yesterday match. We feel shame on your 100 century with the world's weakest team of Bangladesh. You can proud your self but we always feel shame and decieve. It could have fixed match
Re: Re: ha ha ha
by debasish datta on Mar 17, 2012 09:43 PM
it is clear man, he is just not physically and mentally fit enough to play well against good opposition. See even against Srilanka he got out to a full toss and in an ugly manner. He tried his best to fool the umpire in that match. But alas truth is truth. why to celebrate his century which make the team loose against BAN.
Re: ha ha ha
by suzie fernandes on Mar 18, 2012 01:08 AM
plz dont bark like dogs...only little knowledge prople can talk lightly ...to otheres..coz they even dont know how to hold the bat
Sachin bradman puh who , sachin without any doubt.
Sachin 32000 runs. Bradman 6000 runs.
Sachin 269 sixes. Bradman 6 sixes.
Sachin played all three formats of cricket. Bradman played just one format with just 52 matches.
Sachin played on 90 pitches. Bradman played on 7 pitches.
Sachin played against 13 teams. Bradman played against 4 teams.
Sachin played 650 matches. Bradman played just 52 matches.
Sachin took 200 wickets. Bradman took 2 wickets.
sachin played walsh ambros akram mcgrath warne murli etc bradman played larwood only
sachin time video analysis for batsman shortcomings technolgy bradman no such
Bradman's contribution is less than 18% contribution of Sachin to CRICKET. Hats off to master blaster.
Thanx to everyone for participation in pretty easy question.
@SelfishBradman Yeah, there were no jets in 1930s. Thats not the fault of Sachin. Bradman played in that era where there were no techniques available to know weaknesses of batsman. On the other side before every series opposition does special homework for Sachin to take his wicket as early as possible. Yeah, there was only one format in 1930, thats not fault of Sachin again. In Sachin's era three formats were available and he played every format with consistency and brilliance. Yeah, there were less test playing nations in comparison to today which means less variety of oppositions which helps to boost your average.
Re: .
by vijay on Mar 17, 2012 09:25 PM
Every one knows that Sachin is better even it is now scientifically proved.
The Bradman museum is erecting a statue of Sachin.
Do you know why they are erecting his statue,to attract crowd, nowdays nobody goes there but when sachin statue get erected there ,more people will attract towards the museaum.
Sachin is bigger than cricket ,and don was a cricketer. Its easy who is best .
Sachin is better than Bradman by FAR!
Cool Proofs: *1 Sachin played against the world best bowlers. i.e. Shane Warne,Murli, Mcgrath, Lee, Thompson, Gillespie etc.. *2 Sachin Played matches regularly. I mean today's tight schedule u can see as Sachin played 166 Tests in 20 years whereas Bradman played only 52 in 20 years. *3 Sachin was given out LBW oftenly in his career whereas in Bradman's era there was no LBW in the game. *4 Sachin got out occasionally due to bad umpiring in his career. where as Bradman was favoured by umpire on thin edges.
Re: Re: .
by debasish datta on Mar 17, 2012 09:31 PM
forgotten one thing bradman's test batting average is 99,94 and sachin's 55.44,more reason to attract people.
Re: Re: .
by krishna sumanth on Mar 18, 2012 01:14 AM
Can you tell me once instance when Sachin played Thomson?? Gillespie is the all time best bowler??
Have you bothered looking at how Sachin really performed against the top bowlers of his era? In tests that had either of Wasim, Donald, McGrath and Ambrose, he averages 36. If the opposition has any of those 4 players, India managed to win only 6 test matches, all on Indian soil and the 'legend' averages 25 (in those 6 tests). Dravid averages 50 in those 6 tests, obviously proving that he was the reason why India won test matches...
Re: .
by krishna sumanth on Mar 18, 2012 01:19 AM
You are obviously not aware that in Bradman's era, the pitches were uncovered, helmets were not there and there was no limit on the number of beamers and bouncers. Even in the dreaded Bodyline series, his average was more than Sachin's career average
