Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from BCCI?
by surya das on Mar 17, 2012 09:40 AM
by ur logic, BCCI did not ve money to do this in Eng aur Aus?
Re: Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from BCCI?
by prakash sharma on Mar 17, 2012 09:49 AM
england australia r too expensive to buy !! .. bangladeshis r happy with whatever they get .. poor country
Re: Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from BCCI?
by deepak menon on Mar 17, 2012 09:51 AM
yes..yes... the game changed in 48th over... how can you imagine some one bowling full tosses.. especially in form bowler who took 4 wks against a much stronger opponents !!!! 49th too was a worse one !!!
Re: Re: Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from BCC
by police on Mar 17, 2012 10:07 AM
yeah.... after the end of 47th over they bargained their win.... good observation... you Beep... Beep...
Re: Re: Re: Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from
by sauron on Mar 17, 2012 04:53 PM
just because of the game changing after 47 th over does not mean the bargain has to be done..after the 47th over...ur tiny intelligence should also have captured that..anyways their are peristeent reports of match fixing in cricket...they way none of them especailly thoose that involve india are ever investigated is ti me proof that soemthing is not right
Re: Re: For his Century Bangladesh purchased Victory from BCCI?
by Ramesh Thakur on Mar 17, 2012 09:54 AM
If it is so, then Sachine must have 150 centuries till date...
Everybody says loss cause loss cause.... one loss was when he scored 143 in sharjah,,, so we qualified, one loss was 175 against aussie where we almost won (best innings ever), one was against pak 136 in test that too almost won, one was 114 in perth which all other ten players threw away the game,,the losses were bcoz of bad team members or horrible bowlers, but just imagine if he hadn't score any hundred than we would be zimbabwe or bangladesh equivalent team, also Jayawardhanes century in 2011 WC final was for loosing cause, but his century set the platform otherwise SL would have been 150 all out,,,,
Re: Just imagine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Ajay on Mar 17, 2012 09:54 AM
I agree. Logic needs to be taught in schools for some people to make them understand this simple fact.
Indian cricket is all about Advtg Dollars BCCI had to start the era of MatchFixing to revive cricket after 2007 WorldCup Debacle. They needed a guy who cud be dependable & controllable & chose Dhoni Now Dhoni realized that if Sachin Scores a century & India wins, ALL credit goes to Sachin, no matter how well others played & he then cant overshadow Sachin in popularity & Advtg. So Dhoni started throwing matches when Sachin had a 100 unless they were absolutely critical. Look at the stats of Sachin 100 ending in Indias win before & After Dhoni was captain
Dhoni keeps on insisting on playing weak/new players so they can be easily manipulated to throw matches. Even ydays match, check scorecard from 35th over. It was Dinda, Pathan & Praveen Kumar that leaked runs so heavily to lose a match that should have been easily won. If they hadnt leaked those runs on Dhonis order, they would have been thrown out. By losing match of Sachins 100th century, Dhoni fulfilled his aim of marginalizing the impact of this event. So all HAIL DHONI, the master Fixer before you hail Sachin the Master Blaster
BTW all these epithets are also Advertising catchphrases (Master Blaster,Nawab of Najafgardh, The Wall, Very Very Special Laxman)
