Consider this scenario: 1. India and SL both beaten by Bangladesh by huge margins - So Bangladesh gets 10 points and enters final. 2. India beat Pak by huge margin - So India also gets 9 point and enters final based on better NRR.
Re: he he he he
by accha hindustani on Mar 16, 2012 06:21 AM
who is this clown who starts his comment with a moronic "hehehe". Must be an acne prone madarsa going paki blockhead. One can hardly understand what he's actually trying to say. Either brush up your grammar or write your comments in hindi. We all understand hindi.
As per jayawardene in aus tour they dont have to depend anybodies result to reach in final but now the situation is lanka has to wait for others result in asiacup....
Re: srilanka has to depend for final
by anil babaldi on Mar 16, 2012 04:44 AM
Not only that, when Virat scored that outstanding century, he said, it was more a result of bad fielding and bowling by SL. What a loser.
Re: srilanka has to depend for final
by deepak ds on Mar 16, 2012 08:09 PM
If the second match against India had not been a tie becoz of Sir Jadeja in CB series, Srilanka would have not reached finals. They have to find 2 more bowlthrowers to bolster their bowling.
Re: There is a statistical possibility that pakistan does not rea
by Amrit Singhania on Mar 15, 2012 09:37 PM
Absolutely. And further, if India beats Pakistan, then NRR does not come into play, as between India and Pakistan, India won the match, so Bangladesh and India go into final.
Of course, this is all hypothetical, but that is true of all sports. Rediff's assertion that Pakistan has reached the final is erroneous at best.