Re: Will Error's reduce?
by Ramprasad Udyavar on Jun 25, 2012 06:43 PM
So you want to move from 98% to 99%. what the use, we should strive for 100%. only then use technology
Re: DRS is not foolproof
by Ramprasad Udyavar on Jun 25, 2012 06:42 PM
Humans can never be 100%, but technology should be 100% else it should not be used
Re: Re: DRS is not foolproof
by Shikari Shambu on Jun 26, 2012 04:33 AM
It is better to use a technology which is 98 or 99% accurate than umpires with 75% accuracy. No technology can be 100% reliable.
Re: BBCI thinks it is boss of ICC!!!!!
by Pratik shah on Jun 25, 2012 07:22 PM
Dear Jayakiran, it is not true that BCCI always oppose something good. I can also say the same about ICC when ICC did not accpet the revised version of Duckworth Lewis system recommended by a person from India.
ICC is baised towards certain groups. And by opposing DRS, BCCI is doing the same with ICC. BCCI is opposing DRS and ball tracking becoz it is introduced by a american. I think you need to improve your knowledge about cricket jayakiran.
With DRS it is difficult to get umpires to fix matches for you...have you seen some umpires raise the fingerr as soon as the ball strikes the pad and vice versa move away from their positions even though it was plumb lbw decision.
This was clearly visible in Indias forced elevation to No 1 Test Ranking
Re: good one
by Ganesh V on Jun 25, 2012 04:52 PM
Agree. Need to see how the Egoistic BCCI will react. Even if it 50% accurate, it is still better than not having it.
Re: Re: good one
by madan menon on Jun 25, 2012 05:01 PM
abs. correct.this time I am with you..BCCI needs some lessons..they should realize they are not the law...DRS is here to stay if BCCI do not like it they can stop playing cricket...
