Discussion Board

Gavaskar slams decision to resume cricket with Pakistan


Total 348 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Vivek Shukla
Send the other team too
by Vivek Shukla on Jul 16, 2012 09:22 PM

If Pakistan wants to send cricket team, then it should send the team that played major role is Mumbai attack along with cricket team. Other wise no cricket with Pak.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Suhrud Patel
well done
by Suhrud Patel on Jul 16, 2012 09:21 PM

atlast there is somebody who can speak for india , we are proud of you sunny

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jonnalagedda Pardhasaradhi
Gavaskar slams BCCI
by Jonnalagedda Pardhasaradhi on Jul 16, 2012 09:14 PM

Of late many match fixing scandals are associated with pak players.We should look into if any financial incentives to BCCI decision makers by
PCB are made/offered.Gavaskar is too much of a gentleman to say this kind of thing.The president of BCCI is already under investigation in AP in unfair business practices(Japan's case)
I

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mahendra
no cricket with porks.
by Mahendra on Jul 16, 2012 09:13 PM

not only sports, India should cut off all ties with porks.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rajesh singh
gavaskar is right.
by Rajesh singh on Jul 16, 2012 09:09 PM

Last time when cricket was resumed many of the pakistaan sponsored teroooor members had entered & did mapping survey of mumbai & other cities & then made havoc in mumbai attack.
Now you want to once again creat such situation. You want to invite the demon once again. We all know we p[olice & security can never keep tab on each & every one visiting India under pak passport. So dont do it once again. Is ot decision of Srinivas or other chamchas of him. He is not bothered as he is making millions in cement cartel & cricket funds.
Gavaskar a true Mumbaikar. Vented out the anguish what they had gone through.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rajesh singh
Cricket ties with pakistan-Gavaskar is right
by Rajesh singh on Jul 16, 2012 09:08 PM

Last time when cricket was resumed many of the pakistaan sponsored teroooor members had entered & did mapping survey of mumbai & other cities & then made havoc in mumbai attack.
Now you want to once again create such situation. You want to invite the demon once again. We all know our police & security can never keep tab on each & every one visiting India under pak passport. So dont do it once again.
Is it decision of Srinivas or other chamchas of him. He is not bothered as he is making millions in cement cartel & cricket funds.
Gavaskar a true Mumbaikar. Vented out the anguish what they had gone through.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Pramod Lakshman Vaishampayan
Indo Pak cricket
by Pramod Lakshman Vaishampayan on Jul 16, 2012 09:04 PM  | Hide replies

I support Gavaskar's stand. Pakistan has never shown any reorse or urgency to act against perpetrators of 26/11. Instead it has been repeatedly proven that it has been state sponsored act. Why do we have to bend backward to appease Pakistan. Pakistanis are only over enthusiastic about the series. We have also seen that sponsors of terror visit India on the pretext of cricket to carry out their evil design. The national security and safety of our people is more important than BCCI's desire to make money.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Rajesh singh
Re: CRICKET
by Rajesh singh on Jul 16, 2012 09:17 PM
No dr Dildaaaaar Ahmed.
When u saw yourself in a mirror you must have thought "Yes Gavaskar is wiser than the the monkey in the mirror."
ha ha ha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pujaari
Indo pak series
by pujaari on Jul 16, 2012 09:02 PM  | Hide replies

My concerns with indo pak series are not about the cricket but people who travel with paki team and visas that are given for the series. It has been well established that whenever pak has come to India there have been a lot miscreants who have travelled with them and a big national security threat

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 348 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message