Discussion Board

Jadeja makes history, scores 3rd first class triple ton


Total 32 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
Incredible India
Earned enough money in IPL to distribute ...
by Incredible India on Dec 02, 2012 10:38 PM

among poor Ranji players..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
chirag foryou
Real talent ! ! !
by chirag foryou on Dec 02, 2012 08:46 PM  | Hide replies

.
Jadeja is a real talent. But, as usual all rounders are less respected in Indian team. He will not be treated well.

Disaster like Rohit gets chance per chance, and RJadeja and M tiwary have to struggle all the time......very ridiculous.

R jadeja and M.Tiwary both must be included at least in a ODI team permanently.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
abhishek singh
Re: Real talent ! ! !
by abhishek singh on Dec 02, 2012 10:32 PM
old sachin will ruin everybody's chances.no hopeers forget it. acountry where stagant people like srk,sachin,sonia no hopers for good talent.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
x y
Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by x y on Dec 03, 2012 04:43 AM
both of you get lost

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Talisman
Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by Talisman on Dec 03, 2012 04:44 AM
Jadeja has done well. But that doesn't mean Abishek singh can bullshit us here and make silly claims about JAdeja not getting chances. This guy has got more chances than even Rohit sharma and has performed briefly and never been consistant.

About Sachin being old., age is a relative factor. If Abishek compares himself to his grandpa, may be he is young. But if he compares himself to a little kid, Abhishek is an oldie from a kid's stand point.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
abhishek singh
Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by abhishek singh on Dec 03, 2012 07:35 AM
i do not think u got the point.What i mean is unless we have non performers out whtever their stature be should be chucked out and any new good talent should come in.Had Dravid not retiter pujara got a chance.Sachin has been non performer from last two years after worl cup and greedily playing.If pointing is shown the door why not sachin can move to have new talent.harbahajan,zaheer,dhoni all should go.anayways we are losing,lets make a team foe future.selfishness and stagnant people should be avoided.sachin has all the records he is playing for money and sponsers.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Praveen
Re: Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by Praveen on Dec 03, 2012 07:41 AM
If Dravid were to be in the team; even then Pujara would have played and Yuvi would have sat out. What's Sachin got to do with Jadeja's ton. YOu just need a space to write anti-sachin comments i guess. Use your room walls like Gajini to write.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Talisman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by Talisman on Dec 03, 2012 08:19 AM
Abishek - I disagree. Pujara would have learnt and developed a lot more, had he played with Dravid and Laxman, specially on foreign soil. Now, he has to develop on his own. If you have really looked at Sachin's scores with any of your favourite playersm he is still averaging 40s. That is blody good by any standards. Get your facts right before you try to play a selector and people will listen to you.

Byt prematurely retiring great players before other guys are ready, you dont allow them to develop.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sunil Vaidya
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 03, 2012 08:42 AM
talisman good players learn by themselves...dravid also did not learn from anybody...such players learn on their own...

Forward   |   Report abuse
Talisman
Re: Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by Talisman on Dec 03, 2012 10:37 AM
The main reason that I completely disagree with Abhishek's comments on Sachin is - The guy is not criticking dhoni who has been laying ducks in tests for ever. He hardly scores any. He critiques Sachin only because of his age. So you care more about the person;s age than how he plays. Guys like you are disgusting.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chirag foryou
Re: Re: Re: Real talent ! ! !
by chirag foryou on Dec 05, 2012 05:35 AM
.
Talisman, Jadeja is always consistent with bowling. He was most of the time better than full time bowler

It is his bating cost him his place. But he is not hitter of bowl ( like YV) He is a grafter of the ball. He must play in middle order, rather than down of up the order ( where hitting is required)

While Rohit was always a burden. He is no good has batsman or bowler. Importantly he has no talent at all
.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
CC
Great
by CC on Dec 02, 2012 08:40 PM  | Hide replies

this give us indication how bad our bowling standard in domestic level...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
laxman kotian
Re: Great
by laxman kotian on Dec 03, 2012 10:17 AM
rightly said

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Om Shanti
His Highness
by Om Shanti on Dec 02, 2012 08:36 PM  | Hide replies

Sir RavendraJadeja joined an elite list of seven others who have three triple tons to their credit. They are Sir Don Bradman, Brian Lara , Bill Ponsford, Wally Hammond, W G Grace, Graeme Hick, and Mike Hussey.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ram Alegavi
replace
by Ram Alegavi on Dec 02, 2012 08:33 PM

he shud get his reward he can replace yuvraj in Indian team

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAJU subramani
jadeja
by RAJU subramani on Dec 02, 2012 08:31 PM

Great kncok...show thi form in one day/t20s ...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
arvin g
on 3rd day jadeja...
by arvin g on Dec 02, 2012 07:42 PM  | Hide replies

will be allowed to score a quardruple century... only the 2nd indian to do so... and then he will become part of test team... after all he belongs to elite team of csk owned by bcci super goons...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
navdeep johar
Re: on 3rd day jadeja...
by navdeep johar on Dec 02, 2012 07:48 PM
by that std Rohit shd make atleast 200.. proves rohit is useless, jadeja at least is much better than r.sharma

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ram Alegavi
Re: on 3rd day jadeja...
by Ram Alegavi on Dec 02, 2012 08:35 PM
nimbalkar 443 not out friend of anna hazare

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 32 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message