Mr ganguly the report came not in CSK match before itself Samuels bowled 122/KM speed against Mumbai Indians in previous match the speed equal to average speed of Fast bowlers also gayle also bowl same kind of throw ball so IPL need to ban Samuels and gayle for bowling in matches....
In no way this team can be given chance to get forward. It is playing well, having chance to get into semis, and Ganguly is there! Come and disturb them. Bleaters become active now!
CSK & MI are the two most influential sides in IPL-V, with lots of clout, due to their owners money bag power, & also having the two most iconic players in their ranks dhoni & sachin. unfortunately both these sides got derailed in their matches against PWI, thus some reasons have to be found for irritating the winner. moreover PWI owner subroto roy sahara is a thorn in the eyes of the BCCI due to his disputes with BCCI, specially srinivasan owner of CSK,thus frdstating roy's team helps CSK.whatever happens now, the final of IPL- V will be between CSK & MI with the latter winning.
Re: disputed bowling action
by LAKSHMINARAYANAN narayanan on Apr 17, 2012 10:53 AM
Dont invent stories. In the past any franchisees complained any team member for suspicious action? Once in the previous IPL one Person Kamran Khan was reported for suspcious action. Thereafter samuels. Nothing to do with either BCCI/Csk or MI. If samuels is not allowed bowling no side will take advantage, he is a non regular bowler. In the Past Harbhajan singh ,Rajesh Chouhan and others were periodically reported for suspicious action. Now Harbhan has corrected his action. Why you blame any body for this. Ganguly says some other worst casese are there in IPL, then why not he report it for taking action. He should not take side with bowler with suspious bowler. Let the technical authorities clear his action. Why you jump into the conclusion.
Re: Re: disputed bowling action
by freak y on Apr 17, 2012 11:18 AM
I should say ppl should not blindly support teams. I see nothing wrong in what Jugal has said. Its a theory(probably not true) but what Narayan has posted in response is bullshit. Bajji, Rajesh Couhan, Murali and others were reported before the rule was changed to allow up to 15 degrees of bent arm. This will allow most of the chuckers through (include Botha, Ajmal, Shoib Malik and Samuels too). just because he bowled at 122 kmph does not make it illegal. There should be proof that his arm was indeed bent more than 15 degrees
Re: Re: Re: disputed bowling action
by sakar panch on Apr 17, 2012 11:49 AM
You idiot. The arm was twisted it is aparent. Lucky he got away with warning. If measured, he would be out totally. Face facts man.
