Re: Re: Tiger
by True Voice on Sep 23, 2011 11:15 AM
IS is OK here while relating to others. Otherwise as per your grammar WAS is applicable from the moment he retired
Re: Re: Re: Tiger
by Jayanth on Sep 23, 2011 11:32 AM
You are wrong. Pataudi was a cricketer not "is". Just as Sharmila "was" a heroine, not "is". So, "was" is the correct usage. It has nothing to do with relativity
Re: Re: Tiger
by lfmumbai on Sep 23, 2011 11:30 AM
The fact of the matter is "He is and was just average player". Even today's Ranji players do better if given chance to play.
Re: Tiger
by sivanand chaturvedi on Sep 23, 2011 11:13 AM
Nobody will agree; also you have forgotten his physical shortcomings. Please change your opinion and re-write.
Re: Re: Tiger
by divine on Sep 23, 2011 12:26 PM
my sister lost her one eye when she was just three years old and has completed her post graduation in electrical and electronics. She even completed PGDCA from one of Universities in TN and stood State Second.
Re: Re: Tiger
by divine on Sep 23, 2011 12:09 PM
dont you talk loudly about Nathuram Gothse even after 63 years and will continue to talk about him for years to come.