The expert replies: How many players have been 'timed out'?

Re: 32-27-5-0!! by Gopalram on Sep 08, 2011 01:07 PM Yes Barrington was batting.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: 32-27-5-0!! by Sudeepta Chakraborty on Sep 08, 2011 10:59 AM Barrington!!! Why he? He was quite a stroke maker given the era. The apt name would be Chris Tavare or Boycott I presume. Nadkarni was an attacking bowler so this spell only underlines his class not a negative bowling strategy adopted by him. He was a miser who would even go to the slips to field on his bowling.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: 32-27-5-0!! by Palmas Palmas on Sep 08, 2011 01:04 PM Padmanabhan-ji mentioned Barrington because it was indeed Barrington facing Nadkarni for a long period of that spell!    Forward   |   Report abuse