Dhoni sir, you are the best. the best ever indian player. you are unparalleled in indian cricket in the winning attitude and passion you bring to the game. no indian player in the history of cricket has been able to achieve what you have achieved. you always give your best and encourage other players and extract the most out of them be he a senior or junior, a player in form or out of form.
there may be indian players with better record, better talent and better technique than you, but still you can do what these players cannot do. the no. of amazing innings you play and bring victory to india with so much awesome consistency even they have not been able to do as consisitently as you.
there are very few players of your type for whom team achivements are more important and take precendence over personal achievements or milestones. the impact you have brought on indian cricket, players and fans and even people from other walks of life is simply incredible. the way you selflessly lead the team and play is a lesson for new generation players (and even for older players)
you are always involved in the game yet are still detached from it. you dont blow your trumpet and after the win you simply melt in the crowd and allow your team members to enjoy and take the credit and praise.
you really are to the indian team what krishna was to the pandavas. whatever you say and do is gita...
Re: Dhoni
by aganst all on Sep 07, 2011 12:54 PM
You are the worst, the worst ever player. You are in the gambling attitude and passion (for fixing)u bring to the game. no player in the history has been able to earn what u earned by fixing. u always give ur worst & discourage others and extracted the least out of them a senior or junior, a player in form or out of form. there are players with worst record, talent& technique but still u can do worst than them. the nos. balatkar innings u played n bring defeat to the country with so much awesome consistency. there r very few players of ur type for whom team achievements are less important than self and endorsement, advrtsmnt. the impact u have brought on game, players, fans & even people is simply horrible. The way u selfishly lead the team and play is a forgettable lesson for new and old generation players. u have always involved in the match fixing. U blow ur trumpet and after the defeat u simply blame team members. U really are to the team what Shakuni was to the Kauravas. Whatever u say & do is a satanic verses & horror story.
It is schocking to seew ICC umpires from the elite panel make a hash of DRS.The end result is more doubts have crept in the minds about technology including that on 'hot spot' as much on the 'ball tracking'.It is simply unbelievable that international umpires are not guided by the basics and the fundamentals of introduction of any DRS system.The basic principles which the 3rd umpires should keep in mind even while using a DRS system should be that the field umpires are still the best placed to give correct decisions however in few 'close' cases there could be 'error of judgement' which could need further confirmation by use of technology.So, the idea is to get 'confirmation' that field umpires' decision was right rather than to reverse his decision.Hence in some exceptional cases whenever even DRS doesn't throw up a clear cut decision, then original decision of field umpire must stand.It is not just giving the benefit of doubt to batsman.In this particular case umpire had given 'NOT OUT' which was confirmed by the DRS however the 'sound' intoroduced the element of doubt.So, in case of doubt the original decision should have stood.There is no question of the 3rd umpire considering snickometer or sound etc and ignoring the DRS.Only solution is to accept DRS 100% knowing fully well its limitation and keep working on technolgy perfection.
i am very amused with cricket fans reactions now that help of technology is taken...
previously when indian players, sachin, dhoni kumble and others and bcci expressed their reservations about the udrs technology a majority of cricket fans abused bcci and indian players and said that bcci should embrace this technology as the percentage of correct decisions would increase...
i had then said that when sachin starts to be given out time and again these same fans will make a about turn about their opinion....
what i said has come true only the player involved is not sachin but dravid...
but the point remains...the same fans who wanted this technology to be used are now expressing a total opposite opinion...now that they are getting what they want they are realising that this is not exactly what they had in mind...
when some time ago dhoni expressed his displeasure at the mixing of technology and human decision, the word he used ''adulteration'' of technology and human decision derived a lot of ridicule and abuse...all those who ridiculed and abused dhoni are now agreeing/echoing dhoni's thoughts and sentiments...
THIRD UMPIRES (BLACK, BROWN OR WHITE)ALWAYS GIVE DECISIONS THAT FAVOUR OF THE WHITE SKINNED SIDES. MATCH REFEREES(BLACK, BROWN OR WHITE)ALWAYS GO EASY ON THE WHITE SKINNED PLAYERS AND STRICTLY PENALISE THE BROWN SKINNED ONES IN CASE OF ANY TRANSGESSION (REAL OR PERCEIVED). EVEN THE RAIN GODS (ARE THEY ALSO BLACK, BROWN OR WHITE ?) COME DOWN HEAVILY WHENEVER THE SITUATION IS AGAINST THE WHITE SKINNED SIDE, BUT NEVER APPEAR OTHERWISE. THINK ABOUT IT. KIRKIT IZ A PHUNNY GAME.
Reason is very simple.They don't have a quality bowler to take Dravid's wicket. Legally he was not out four times in the recently concluded test series.
Two times through out the innings he played and two times umpire has given wrong decision out (as planned by the English Board).
Most importantly this is happened only to Dravid because English board knows very well Dravid who is the only player capable of playing and winning matches for India at present.
If the umpire would have been correct then the result of the concluded test series would have been different.
They don't want Dravid be in the crease long time because Dravid's one wicket is as good as 10 wickets.
Tiwary is a fairly good to replace Rohit, but I dont no why srikanth picked up VinayKumar,I am sorry to say, He is not an international bowler. Selectors should have given Utappa or Rayudu or Irfan in place of Jadeja. In england conditions Irfan may outshine many of the current players in the team both as a batsman and bowler. when will they come with Irfan Pathan?
Re: what going on BCCI..
by Santosh Rane on Sep 05, 2011 11:02 AM
Yes i am 100% agree with you friend. Vinay kumar doesn;t have anything which a fast bowler should be having in him. No speed, no swing, no line & length and most importantly 'Attitude'. Why they ignoring Irfan Pathan i dont know?
Re: Dhoni
by rajkamal dubey on Sep 05, 2011 10:56 AM
dhobni should also ask himself why he is failing repeatedly as a batsman...and going by current performance should not he not be left out of the indian team...that honesty would be appreciated
Re: Re: Dhoni
by Sunil Vaidya on Sep 05, 2011 01:18 PM
rajkamal dubey, going by sachin's record in crisis conditions should he be called the greatest batsman ever...how many times has he helped india in winnings/saving matches from difficult situations...
if somebody makes more runs than the other batsman in the same no. of innings should he be called the better batsmen of the two?
if there are many batsmen who have rescued india from tough positions and helped them win or save the match many many more times than some other player who though he may have not played well in tough conditions should he be called a better batsmen than others simply because he has played more matches than them and has more runs than them mostly scored in easy conditions and on flat tracks and by virtue of coming to the crease before them and getting the chance to spend more time at the crease and get more balls to face and have the luxury of having more batsmen to support him by virtue of batting up the order and others having to face less the no. of balls and have less support available to them because they come down the order most of the times?
should a particular batsmen be called greater than other batsmen just because he gets the first crack of opposition total and when the total is high he usually gets out soon and if target is less he takes full advantage of it and scores centuries and other players dont get to take advantage of low targets because when their time comes there is nothing much left to do...
Re: Re: Re: Dhoni
by Sunil Vaidya on Sep 05, 2011 01:18 PM
hello ratikant sahoo, are you and rajkamal dubey siasmese twins? whenever one posts the others posts also comes sooner or later?
