i am very amused with cricket fans reactions now that help of technology is taken...
previously when indian players, sachin, dhoni kumble and others and bcci expressed their reservations about the udrs technology a majority of cricket fans abused bcci and said that bcci should embrace this technology as the percentage of correct decisions would increase...
i had then said that when sachin starts to be given out time and again these same fans will make a about turn about their opinion....
what i said has come true only the player involved is not sachin but dravid...
but the point remains...the same fans who wanted this technology to be used are now expressing a total opposite opinion...now that they are getting what they want they are realising that this is not exactly what they had in mind...
Re: i am very amused
by Sunil Vaidya on Sep 04, 2011 07:18 PM
when some time ago dhoni expressed his displeasure at the mixing of technology and human decision, the word he used ''adulteration'' of technology and human decision derived a lot of ridicule and abuse...all those who ridiculed and abused dhoni are now agreeing/echoing dhoni's thoughts and sentiments...
Re: Re: Re: Re: i am very amused
by shibu james on Sep 05, 2011 10:19 AM
Abhi...you are absolutely right....This AP is really a retarded bugger who never has any original comments of his own... He will only reply and try to act smart on others comments....!!! Total Pshcho this guy.....!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: i am very amused
by Against Pseudos on Sep 05, 2011 10:37 AM
:) Considering that my message was to Sunil Vaidya and you guys decided to reply and act smart, I have no option but to allow you to take the same title you tried giving me... :) So keep blabbering! :)
Re: i am very amused
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 07:20 PM
i opposed it from beginning. It's use was according to Angrez plans to bolster their confidence from test 1.
Angrez did not play 1 dayers to begin with because they knew it will bolster india chances and they could run out of DRS use to their advantage.
When they have been asked to go by only the hot spot, why the hell snikko was referred to? Snikko may be misleading at times as it can pick up any noise at that instant and not just the ball kissing the bat or a faint edge. Why is that when it comes to bad decisions, it's only the players from the subcontinent who end up getting a raw deal always?
Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) third (rated) umpi
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:27 PM
why do you want any of that tTrash, is english language not enough of burden we carry.
Re: Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) third (rated)
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 07:01 PM
continued ..
angrez had traditional cheat and spy system that they have not abandoned, now they have bolstered themselves with program to make their players be the best in world. Aussies are following it closely.
Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) third (rated) umpires
by Against Pseudos on Sep 04, 2011 07:15 PM
ALL players get bad decisions. Only certain countries play it up as being raw deals.
Re: Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) third (rated)
by Injun Abhi on Sep 04, 2011 08:20 PM
Psycho, ALL players get bad decisions and ALL these players are generally from Sub Continent. And we have to raise it up as most of us're no longer under colonial slave mindset..
Moron like you will always hurt us, but then that's a life..
Re: Re: Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) third (rated)
by Against Pseudos on Sep 04, 2011 09:31 PM
:-). Good to know that. And if you believe that umpiring standards are close to 100% when others are playing then I truly admire your imaginative powers. ;-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) th
by Injun Abhi on Sep 05, 2011 04:37 AM
Psycho, wow. I can't imagine you got no retarded stuff left to post here..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Penalise the erring (blind in other words) th
by Injun Abhi on Sep 05, 2011 04:37 AM
Psycho, wow. I can't imagine you got no retarded stuff left to post here..
dDonkey comment by Nasir Hussein was deeply rRacist .. even people like myself got fooled that it was a genuine fFrustration from Nasir.
What i say to nNasir, how so ever many layers of gGhora sSkin you put by bButtingg deepp in gGhora culture, your fate will be no different from SSaddam's be it from hands of firangs or kKalas.
Angrez and videshi is full of double mouth sSnakes, they say and mean something else.
Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and nail many
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:23 PM
continued ..
DRS used to Cook Dravid again ... DRS in combination of umpires have been used to give angrez key breakthroughs all along and boost their confidence.
drs tech is cCrap, why, at the core, it will be ICC's toy with ICC or manufacturer's employee handling YES-NO button. The toy can be fudged anytime. Core ICC is like ECB or pro non-desi. Core ICC can give titles to anyone or pay to any Asian or African for a position in ICC (like haroon, assad as umpire, etc) but they are not the core. Core ICC paid Micheal holding to deliver lecture that did not favor India. Even umpires are scared to not go out of line against core ICC because they could loose next assignment or award. Such is this crooked system. And tendulkar fell for it so he is patronized by videshi and the core ICC. lesser said about the sorts of cricekt balls were given to england (because it is not a lock-seal box for both teams). Also, india was not given those cricket balls 2 months in advance to practice. Few of those un-used balls, india can bring back and ask Umpires to make Angrez play with it. Concerns about pitches being doctored over-night were there. Some place fields were made wet selectively (T20). In-spite of all these cheating, spying(stealing) and sorcery in place, we are not denying that angrez have practiced like crazy under their Program to be number 1.
India woes was compounded by BAD SELECTION and Indian management and coach being lazy about not checking the fitness issues. contined
Re: Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and nail
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:24 PM
Angrez have tried their same formula for righties, with angled balls landing near off stump and swinging out (to miss bat for snick or hit wicket) and with odd ones coming in for favourable LBWs or bouncing for a surprise snick (that hit rohit finger). INDIAN battting have not moved their legs to counter the swing on rise or hit almost wide balls or counter angrez moves to push Indian batting to the backfoot. same tactics is applicable for lefties.
Bowlers like Dernbach have changed their angre of grip on seam to wobble the ball, change it's speed and do more variation. India koho shuru mein 4's mharneey chahiyee phir ussey 6 mhareey jhaab settel hoo jayee. Even after multi-nation composition of Angrez team, they dislike india taking any advise from Desi from south-asia. Now Aussie also have a Desi player, hopefully that does not take away support of South-Asia.
WHEN INDIANs MOVE feet properly, angrez hate it. So wildly did Stuart Broad react against Dhoni move to ask for LBW on ball leaving off stump and hitting high on pad, it all happened when Dhoni moved his feet to come to offside for a hit. It was like being able to figure out early the todh to Angrez tactics of angled ball landing "around off stump for swing-rise and odd one coming in with rise".
Broad thought his daddy friends will give LBW yet again. --- WHEN INDIANs MOVE feet properly, angrez hate it.So wildly did Stuart continued ..
Re: Re: Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and n
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:25 PM
continued ..
So wildly did Stuart Broad reacted against Dhoni move to ask for LBW on ball leaving off stump and hitting high on pad,it all happened when Dhoni moved his feet to come to offside for a hit.It was like being able to figure out early the todh to Angrez tactics of angled ball landing "around off stump for swing-rise and odd one coming in with rise". Broad thought his daddy friends will give LBW yet again. I suppose as indicated below, the new tactics by Dernbatch is to change angle of grip around the seam that made india loose few wickets.
Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and nail many
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:08 PM
dDonkey comment by Nasir Hussein was deeply rRacist .. even people like myself got fooled that it was a genuine fFrustration from Nasir.
Re: Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and nail
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:12 PM
What i say to nNasir, how so ever many layers of gGhora sSkin you put by bButtingg deepp in gGhora culture,
Re: Re: Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some and n
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:13 PM
your fate will be no different from SSaddam's be it from hands of firangs or kKalas.
Re: Re: Re: Re: dont agree for ANY DEBATE, ANGREZ will buy some a
by D S on Sep 04, 2011 06:14 PM
Angrez and videshi is full of double mouth sSnakes, they say and mean something else.
Re: UDRS
by georgepoorobc on Sep 04, 2011 05:53 PM
both ten and rah have threads in their shoulders srikantha the chief selector is a thread himself so unity in bcci
Dravid was Not Out but see what British Media says. Excerpts from BBCWorld coverage on the 03-Sep ODI:
On-field umpire Billy Doctrove adjudged that Dravid had not made contact as the ball went through to wicketkeeper Craig Kieswetter but, although the "Hotspot" thermal imaging camera concurred, TV umpire Marais Erasmus said there was a sound and that he could see a deflection - a view later backed up by the "Snickometer" which highlighted a clear noise as the ball passed the bat.
BBC Test Match Special summariser Mark Butcher said: "Hot Spot is not something you can completely rely on.
"It's a bad piece of kit for those fine nicks but Dravid's body language told me he was out because the millisecond the ball passed the bat, he jerked his head to see behind."
And after the game, Parthiv Patel admitted: "I heard a noise."
Re: Re: See what BBCWorld has to say
by Against Pseudos on Sep 04, 2011 09:27 PM
Hmmmm. .. Seems you have excellent debating skills. Which consists of calling everyone psycho. :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: See what BBCWorld has to say
by Injun Abhi on Sep 05, 2011 04:39 AM
Psycho, wow. I can't imagine you got no retarded stuff left to post here..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: See what BBCWorld has to say
by Injun Abhi on Sep 05, 2011 05:31 AM
Psycho, wow. I can't imagine you got no retarded stuff left to post here..
Re: See what BBCWorld has to say
by Against Pseudos on Sep 04, 2011 10:38 PM
Good that Erasmus was proven right by Snickometer. Is that what u r trying to say?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: See what BBCWorld has to say
by Injun Abhi on Sep 05, 2011 05:31 AM
Psycho, wow. I can't imagine you got no retarded stuff left to post here..
