Re: Not easy to speak
by Chaturchuramoni Chatterjee on Nov 24, 2011 02:46 AM
Kambli's International career finished in 2000, he played his last Ranji Match in 2004, and this is 2011.
in 1996 WC semi final when I was studying my 10th , I still remembering that match, after sachi's out india collapsed , realy something happend it must invetigate with independent team, kambily is too late to open his mind
i think kambli should comeout earlier, whether he is right or wrong, that doesnot matter, as everybody knows that azhar found guilty in match fixing and banned for life time. and also ajay jadeja and mongia is also invovled, and if we analyze that match anyone can believe Kambli. but the time to declare this is wrong, kambli should have declare this much much earlier.
India's decision to field first was rewarded with wickets of dangerous openers (during that WC) Jayasurya and Kalu. That pitch had really detoriated and was impossible to play on it. Jadeja was bowled by ball spinning behind his bumps. Actually curator should be blamed for creating such a wicket and even if it was created for Indians how curator was sure of India winning the toss. Ranatunga also said, he would have opted to bat first after winning toss. In the end he said, it was a good toss to loose. It was total bad luck for Indians to loose that match and all creait goes to curator of the pitch. Kambli has lost his senses and feeling jealous about other cricketers making money.
I am not sure what Mr. Kambli aims to accomplish by this ‘revelation’. Let us look at the facts on the ground. The man he is accusing (Azharuddin) is already serving a life–ban and another (Jadeja) was banned for 5 years never to play for India again. Now, I’m not a big fan of the BCCI, but really, what does Kambli want the BCCI to do? Ban them again? Now let us look at Kambli himself - he last played Test cricket in 1995, was continuously in and out of the team owing to countless disciplinary issues, was finally dumped from even the ODI team after October 2000 and last played senior domestic cricket in 2004. 7 years after playing his last first-class game, he announced his retirement from the format at the age of 39 after also being overlooked by the IPL a few months ago. Add this all up and one is left with the feeling that he is doing this just for the sake of free publicity, a feeling of sour grapes and to get his 15 minutes in the spotlight. By his actions, the man is becoming a joke and a sad one at that. Let it go Vinod. It is over.
Re: RE: Something amiss at 1996 WC SF..
by vinay on Nov 23, 2011 11:11 PM
question is not bcci vl ban azhar jadeja or not. but if bcci start the probe n its proven that the semi was also fixed then it has many repurcussions not merely involving the 2 tainted cktrs. earlier azr jad were banned for their links but now with the proof abt them, many other cktrs name might also crop up.
The biggest question is why was srinath given just 7 overs? His figures were 3-34. Whereas Jadeja was given 5 over in which he gave away 31 runs. Also Azar and Jadeja both were accused of match fixing. Azar need to answer this question first.
Re: The biggest question is why was srinath given just 7 overs
by yash yashank baghel on Nov 22, 2011 01:09 PM
I do agree with you bro. The way Azhar give lollypop catch, the way jadeja left his leg stum & Nayan Mongia usless hit seems like, Kambli is not saying lie.......
