i had read an article some years back a murderer and another a rapist who had committed more than 100 crimes were being tried they were asked by the magistrate are you guilty this professional criminals ofcourse said no ,same is the case of ponting .APART FROM CRICKET SACHIN AS A HUMAN BEING IS A THOROUGH GENTLEMAN THE WORLD KNOWS IT EXCEPT A MAN CALLED ricky ponting he is trying to defend his acts of cheating by saying sachin would not have walked off the field if he would have known that umpire had not given him out.
Re: ponting the master cheat
by sankar on Mar 24, 2011 02:19 PM
The peopel who are writing here can take a look at the picture. It clearly shows that sachin was trying to show his arms. But, while walking back to the crease, he realised that UDRS was in place and decided accordingly. As I had mentioned in my earlier post that he had not walked in the IPL match against Chennai SK. The nick was same as that of Ponting's. So, there is no question of the gentlemanship here. As Ganguly said, you do not need to walk as many a times umpire's decisions have gone against you. That way I appreciate Ponting that he still waited for UDRS and he made it clear that there might not be enough camera angles to capture and the decision might go in favour of the batsman.
Why are we considering the UGLY Punter's remarks on this issue? If the remarks to be considered of an Aussie, the remarker should be Adam Gilchrist who was criticized by the UGLY Punter in the past for showing sportsmanship related with the same walking-off issue.
Re: Ugly Punter!!!
by sukhdev sangha on Mar 23, 2011 04:08 PM
very true...gilly is the only other player who walks before a decision is given!! ponting is a MUG
Re: Re: Ugly Punter!!!
by Against Pseudos on Mar 23, 2011 06:39 PM
You mean ALL other players including Yuvi, Dhoni, Pathan and Sachin (before this match) are MUGs? Nice.
Re: PONTING IS CORRECT
by ashish sahu on Mar 23, 2011 04:15 PM
Proof: in 1998 sharjah qualifying match-sachin walked off evan though the umpire held him not out and at that time there was no system which could held him out after umpire's decision......you and punter both are stupid.
the only reason sachin walked was because the udrs was in place. if he had not walked the referral would have be taken and sachin would have been proved cheater. ponting incident had happened only recently. sachin admitted it honestly after returning to the pavilion that the udrs would have shown him out and there was no point in hanging around. ganguly has said on tv that sachin has never walked before and let us see if he does that in future.
the truth is with udrs in place there was no point in not walking. sachin certainly did not want to be compared to ponting so he had no choice but to walk.
Re: it was because of udrs
by kissu on Mar 25, 2011 07:12 PM
who is cheater and who is innocent? the world know it, the test match at sydney recently india and austrailia. The ponting made every attempt to cheat and was successful lot of times and had won that match. dont you all know that. Whole austrailia team is a cheater, they think no one can beat them if some one beats them then its was cheating . bloody loosers aussii.
Re: it was because of udrs
by sanath on Mar 23, 2011 03:47 PM
crap ! when did sachin "admit honestly"? to you in private ? this post shows u didnt see the match or the replays, even the expert commentators were not able to spot a nick, and it was obvious that if a review had been taken, sachin would have got the benefit of doubt.
if there was no point in hanging around becoz of udrs, then why did ponting hang around ? does that mean his IQ is negative ?
Re: Re: it was because of udrs
by sukhdev sangha on Mar 23, 2011 04:06 PM
weel i remember atleast 3-4 times when he has walked when given not out!! On top of that there were so many occasion where he was given out when not out, but did u ever see him crib back to umpire for wrong decision..he plays the game in right way...so other present day cricketers comes close to that!
Well I can say that Ponting is wrong in his opinion. I have watched sachin all my life and can tell, he always walks. Forget abt other instance, but sachin had walked away when he was given not out against Aus. In the epic sharjah match where sachin single handed was winning us the match, he edged a short ball when trying to pull. It was over shoulder height, but he had edged it, umpire steve bucker did not give any decision and aussies were appealing. Sachin waited to see if umpire gave a no ball for over shoulder, since umpire didn’t give a no ball(he did not even give him out), he walked off.
Re: Mr.Ponting, sachin had walked even against Aus when given not
by Jaydeep Choudhury on Mar 23, 2011 03:52 PM
You better go and watch all those matched again. May be in one or two cases he walked. Even though Sachin is a gentleman but not a perfect Gentleman in GENTLEMEN's Game. Remember Sachin was suspende for ball tempering.
Re: Re: Mr.Ponting, sachin had walked even against Aus when given
by prakash on Mar 24, 2011 11:29 AM
Ha... what can i say slaves of rac*st ba*tar*d... Sachin if only tampered the ball with his bat. If he was suspended it was for political reasons
Re: Re: Mr.Ponting, sachin had walked even against Aus when given
by akv red on Mar 23, 2011 04:43 PM
One more thing. Sachin never breaks a T.V. after getting out.
Re: Re: Mr.Ponting, sachin had walked even against Aus when given
by sukhdev sangha on Mar 23, 2011 04:02 PM
well u shud remember that ICC had took back the ball tampering issue against him and if u see the video properly it was not ball tampering...
Umpires are paid for giving judgement. If all players walk down themselves, there is no need for umpires. Players will decides outs, fours, sixes etc.Umpires will lose their jobs. Ponting's view is actually god for umpires.
Re: Ponting's view
by Truth on Mar 23, 2011 03:48 PM
Cricket is a gentleman's game . there is no place for cheaters . Again , why should u cheat ? Umpires are not God , so they cant catch all , hence , Ponting did a wrong thing.
Re: Re: Ponting's view
by S Shrikanth on Mar 23, 2011 03:53 PM
The "Truth" is that cricket is now a "Cheaters" game, thats why you see all politicians and businessmen involved in it.
Players are just agents of consumer companies who dictate and fix the matches.
