Re: Sangakkara disappointed with Mumbai as venue for NZ match
by cmm on Mar 05, 2011 11:28 PM
but bangladesh was the host in that match... understand what sanga is saying, he said "i thought HOSTS play at home"
Re: Re: Sangakkara disappointed with Mumbai as venue for NZ match
by surya das on Mar 06, 2011 06:41 AM
But in case of SL vs NZ, only SL is the hosting nation, which means they should play at their home not in Mumbai. Coz Mumbai not part of SL
Re: Re: Sangakkara disappointed with Mumbai as venue for NZ match
by surya das on Mar 06, 2011 06:41 AM
Wht he is trying to say is host nation should play at home. In the case of IndVSBan both were host nations, so in dat place either IndorBan can play at their home.
Re: Re: Sangakkara disappointed with Mumbai as venue for NZ match
by surya das on Mar 06, 2011 06:37 AM
Sanga, wht he is trying to say is host nation should play at home. In the case of Ind vs Ban both were host nations, so in dat place either Ind or Ban can play at their home.
But in case of SL vs NZ, only SL is the hosting nation, which means they should play at their home not in Mumbai. Coz Mumbai not part of SL ;)
