Re: Re: Re: India
by Mr Bean on Mar 05, 2011 01:02 PM
ya wid a pathetic bowling line up.i m disappointd after that eng match..lets see what they do tomorrow :)
Clumsy eh! He went to a movie when everyone else were studying for the forthcoming exam? And the coach had to pull his ear and make him mug with the others? Bad boy.
Re: Ashwin
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 05, 2011 08:07 PM
dhoni always favour northy. Except sachin no one from south or mumbai will get chance as long as politicina dhoni is captain. He could have dropped sachin also but can't do it as it will a national debate.
Re: Re: Ashwin
by Venugopalan on Mar 05, 2011 12:25 PM
who else...chawla..although Chawla is equally good, ashwin is slightly better..he wont give too much runs.
Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by Raghu Rangaswamy on Mar 05, 2011 12:33 PM
Ashwin is good with a bat also.In a match situation similar to India's against England runs scored by people like Ashwin in the end will make a difference between win and loss.Ashwin's few runs in the end could have changed the tie into a win.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 05, 2011 08:09 PM
All dhoni closed friends- raina, yuvi, bhajji, nehra, praveen, chawla are as useless as dhoni.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by harshit suvarna on Mar 05, 2011 12:41 PM
Ashwin is good, but v hv so manu off spinners: Bhajji, Viru & Yusuf. Chawla will provide variety but he bowled 2 many bad balls vs Eng
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by Mr Bean on Mar 05, 2011 12:46 PM
think the other side as well harshit...he bowled superbly in the practise matches..and second thing we dont need too many off spinners as well u r rite
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by Venugopalan on Mar 05, 2011 01:52 PM
mr uday stick to the basics, do not wander here and there, regionalism has no place in the forum..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ashwin
by ASHISH KUMAR on Mar 05, 2011 08:10 PM
Uday is a bhaiya so he wants all useless northy like dhobi, raina, yuvi, bhajji, nehra, praveen, chawla in team
I don't know why all are varried about tomarrows match against ireland because we have strong line up and just one win of ireland should not varried us . India has grorious past of cricket and tomarrow we will win the match against ireland.
Re: INDIA WILL WIN TOMARROW
by Venugopalan on Mar 05, 2011 12:38 PM
if you play carefully nothing can stop you from winning, even against the invisible aussies..
India lost the match because of tendulkar and Ghambeer..Both are equaly culprit for the lose.Tendi(120-115) and Ghambeer(51-61)...in a flat batting pitch...ridiculously bad india should have scored at least 350.but they didnt do that.it is not fair to ask other batsmen to score quick 50 always.if a batman stands in crease for a long time in a batting wicket he must have a strike rate of 120.both tendi and Ghambi cannot do that.Bowlers did an excellent job to hold england and almost they won the match.thay resctricted england heavy batsmen(6 foot 4 inches men with brutal force)in to 338 .great work by zaheer and co.Very bad batting by tendi co...
Re: Not beacause of bowling
by Narinder Sharma on Mar 05, 2011 11:51 AM
@ Tiju Thomas..or whatever ur name is....Are u a born idiot or some kind of an accident happened in ur life that made u mentally sick??Indian batting folded in 49.5 overs. Althouth only 1 ball was left but the fact of the matter is they fell like pack of cards..u must also correct ur knowledge..INDIA DID NOT LOOSE. IT WAS A TIED MATCH.Bhajji dropped struass, Virat dropped Bell..Bell was given not out when even Geof's mum would have ruled him out..Were u blinded on those moments??Were u expecting indian bowlers not to be able to successfully defend 339??If thats the case we must play all 11 batters and no bowlers at all..Did u watch the 1st few overs of the Indian batting?Ball was moving..It was a good total which they couldnt defend..
Re: Not beacause of bowling
by sanath on Mar 05, 2011 12:06 PM
India lost the match ? Strange ! I guess u saw some old match highlights. As far as we are concerned, it was a tie...
Re: Not beacause of bowling
by rajiv singh on Mar 05, 2011 11:42 AM
Wat about 6 wickets falling in the space of 34 runs????????? my freind its easy to type on a keyboard have u ever been to a cricket ground
Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by tiju thomas on Mar 05, 2011 11:47 AM
i have been to ground several times.i know it is not easy to score in slog overs,especially when you get very less balls to face.i found typing is more difficult than batting
Re: Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by Ron Bose on Mar 05, 2011 11:53 AM
Onnu pooda appa..eethoo kothara match kalichu ennu paraya u think that will match ODI's
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by tiju thomas on Mar 05, 2011 12:39 PM
da oomba ,viddi,,,cricket is stupid game and it exclusivly dedicated to fools like you..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by Venugopalan on Mar 05, 2011 12:41 PM
thomas don't abuse in street language..if someone abuses you just ignore..
Re: Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by Narinder Sharma on Mar 05, 2011 11:57 AM
Haha..u made my day with the joke..U have been to ground so u know its hard to score in slog overs:)I have been to the place where NASA is so i know how Mars is:)..Nonesense..Coming to the point of difficulty in scoring during slog overs..Most of the teams score 60-70 reuns in last 5-6 overs..100 runs in last 10 overs used to be a criteria in ODIs not so long ago..and with the experience of T20 i believe thats not a big task.
Re: Re: Not beacause of bowling
by DEEPAK PRASAD on Mar 05, 2011 11:56 AM
Dear Rajiv, How about you ? Have you been ? I think you have been to the ground with the drinks trolley. Isn't it ?
Re: Not beacause of bowling
by cnra37@rediffmail.com on Mar 05, 2011 12:17 PM
He is very particular to call sachin a tendi under the cover of short names but his intentions are clear . There must be limit for everything otherwise this destructive thinking will wash away yourself even. Vall eduthavan Vaalal , iyalkku manasilayallo
