Re: Re: Chris Gayle
by Delhi City on Jun 16, 2011 01:01 PM
But BCCI will not interfere on others issue and why will Mallya.. He knows Gayle is always available for his RCB side...
Re: Gayle
by Delhi City on Jun 16, 2011 01:03 PM
He can shift to Bangladesh, ZIM or even Pakistan to play their team.. No other sides will show their interest in him, as because he is a good player only for T20 and not for Test or even onedayer...
Re: Re: Gayle
by Sameer on Jun 16, 2011 02:35 PM
Delhi City,
Is he shifting houses ? Do you even know the list of things one should do and have to get citizenship in another country ?
On what basis, will he be able to play in Zim or Bangladesh ? You mean to say that the country will bend its immigration rules just so that a 32 year old player can play for the team for maybe 2-3 years ?
Re: Re: Re: Gayle
by rose on Jun 16, 2011 02:52 PM
sameer has all rights 2 comment like this bcoz he has reasons to worry about ind get lose with zim or ban or kenya or namibia if gayle plays 4 these countries
No individual is above the organization. How can he demand USD 800,000 for not participating IPL? If you do not want to play for one organization, you have leave from that.That is it.
Re: Board is correct
by anytime_criticc@rediffmail.com on Jun 16, 2011 11:53 AM
first of all, as far as I know..gayle is one man show of IPL..right? so he can get that money? I think ur a bit confused... But i agree with ur opinion that no player is above the organization.
Re: Re: Board is correct
by Kannan Palaniswamy on Jun 16, 2011 11:55 AM
What I mean from "If you do not want to play for one organization" is, If he do not like West Indies Contract, leave it...play only in IPL..Why he is trying WI again now?
Re: Re: Re: Board is correct
by anytime_criticc@rediffmail.com on Jun 16, 2011 11:59 AM
he represented WI for long time..so how can he leave? But he should agree with Board rules..
Re: Board is correct
by harkol on Jun 16, 2011 02:17 PM
First of all - West Indies is not a country, they are a bunch of countries. Secondly, the monopoly over cricket by boards let them ruin talented folks career needlessly.
The right thing to do is to provide balance. i.e. International Exposure in liu of share of earnings both ways. Which will mean, if Gayle earns good money from IPL, he should be contract bound to pay WICB a portion of it, and when WICB earns good money from an event a portion is shared with cricketer.
In this method, both of them will have vested interest in making both cricket and cricketer gain.
In current model, the boards have vested interest in controlling cricketers and undermining their professional earnings to benefit the boards.
Re: Re: Learn from K.Pieterson....
by anytime_criticc@rediffmail.com on Jun 16, 2011 11:47 AM
Anurag rathore dont know any rules. He simply blabbers and thinks he knows all.
Re: Learn from K.Pieterson....
by mang on Jun 16, 2011 12:14 PM
@Anuran, Yes, he can play for India if you are willing to have him as your wife or husband or brother-in-law!! Why do you always make stupid comments in this forum?!
Re: Re: Learn from K.Pieterson....
by Anurag Rathore on Jun 16, 2011 12:23 PM
Yes. There are some more players like G.Hamilton etc. Some Aussies and SA players are also playing for associate nations.
there was no more discussions in the meeting, Gayle & Co questioned to the board 1) Why Gayle did not get pick into the squad 2) if there is a time frame how long? Should should hava ask apologies instead argue