LBW is the real problem with DRS. To generate an accurate projection, you need to have sample data. A ball bowled to a spot in a given pitch(wherever the game is played) will bounce differently based on the bowlers delivery point, pace apart from the pitch and humidity of the region in that week. A human umpire adjusts since he has a computer better than a super computer in his head. All of us forget the ability of a human mind and think that a limited computer which operates at best around 4GHz is better. DRS doesnt have enough data for a given pitch but has a combined data from all the pitches in a country. You should not be replacing a superior judgemental system (ie umpires) with another limited judgemental system (DRS). There is no point in such a replacement and would be counter productive. Now all of you guys can bring on comments as to why you think I am totally wrong..
LBW is the real problem with DRS. To generate an accurate projection, you need to have sample data. A ball bowled to a spot in a given pitch(wherever the game is played) will bounce differently based on the bowlers delivery point, pace apart from the pitch and humidity of the region in that week. A human umpire adjusts since he has a computer better than a super computer in his head. All of us forget the ability of a human mind and think that a limited computer which operates at best around 4GHz is better. DRS doesnt have enough data for a given pitch but has a combined data from all the pitches in a country. You should not be replacing a superior judgemental system (ie umpires) with another limited judgemental system (DRS). There is no point in such a replacement and would be counter productive. Now all of you guys can bring on comments as to why you think I am totally wrong..
people who are saying they want UDRS system will do an about turn and say we dont want UDRS system when sachin starts to get out repeatedly witht the use of this technology
i though of putting all the decisions through technology.(third umpire) but bcci pulls india back to stone age. due to this guys only india is undeveloped nation
Go BCCI taken a such a good decision. BCCI have take decision all india match to follow the same we dont want he DRS. In DRS system 95% umpire stand his won decision then whyy required this DRS?
Re: Good BCCI
by viswanathan on Jun 11, 2011 04:37 PM
due you know, even 1% of fault umpire decision will change the game. The 1% will decide who will won or loss
Secret Information: BCCI (and some people within the department of Cricket Control in India) have bribed umpires to make decisions favouring India. This information is very true and is the sole reason of the DRS being rejected over and over again. Within a few years (or months), a leading TV channel and its reporters will be providing proof for the same. The biggest cricket cover up expected soon.
this is very cheap step by BCCI, this tells dat dey don't follow cricket happening in other parts of the world. They don't know about the technology. I think ICC should make UDRS compulsary in each and every test playing nation.
Re: Re: cheap step
by Rajaji on Jun 11, 2011 02:53 PM
Both BccI and Upa r mis-managed and run by most corrupt politician ever shorad powar. so no wonder power abuse !
