India won the toss and asked to England bat and the result will be same as in first test that India will loose this match. Fletcher is a former english player. Hence, he will never wish that India should win. He is misguiding our team AS dHONI has no brain as he is not electing to bat in test after winning the toss.
Re: Re: Re: Second test
by pravin sarode on Jul 29, 2011 05:11 PM
pravinkumar will take 5 wickets and score 50 in both the innings will be man of match with 10 wickets and 100 odd runs
Re: Second test
by Amrit Patil on Jul 30, 2011 12:42 PM
'DHONI has no brain' please prove this your higness Mr. Sudhakaran. Just wondering if he has no brain then how India could win the World Cup?
Re: Re: Second test
by siddhartha chakraborti on Aug 20, 2011 01:41 AM
india won the cup not bcoz of dhoni,,,,it was a combined effort,,,in fact how many runs dhoni xscored in the cup?
Re: Re: srisanth
by deepu on Jul 29, 2011 03:14 PM
sheeba how many times u experienced mallus emotions, seems to be like u r an exp "professional", think he was harsh on u
Re: Re: Re: srisanth
by sheeba dev on Jul 29, 2011 03:44 PM
Darling, dont b emotional. u will never find any succesful mallu in cricket team past or present. iam nothing before highly experienced professional ur mum.
Re: Re: Re: srisanth
by pravin sarode on Jul 29, 2011 05:12 PM
pravinkumar will take 5 wickets and score 50 in both the innings will be man of match with 10 wickets and 100 odd runs so come on pravin we are watching you all vigilantly!
Although Presence of Zaheer would have made things easier it is not that India cannot win matches w/o Zaheer.The available remaining Indian bowlers are no ordinary bowlers as they have proved in the past. India have won many important matches w/o Zaheer and in fact T20 WC Final in 2007 was won w/o Zaheer,Sachin,Sehwag and other big names. It is a question of self belief and positive attitude of the playing XI which would help them win rather than keep harping on non-availability of players not in their control. Another important factor would be how Sachin approaches the game because his negative attitude of going into shell in the 2nd innings made it difficult for the Indian side to force a draw. Sachin must play his natural game w/o worrying about his century. If he gets out , so be it, nothing can be done after it takes all of just one ball to get one out. Even if he contributes 60-70 runs when the team is in difficulty and India goes to win the Test, his 60-70 runs would be more valuable than if he gets a century and the team loses. The media and the experts are also biased in letting off Sachin on flimsy excuses lightly on his pathetic one hr ‘blocking’ spree in the 2nd innings even as they criticize Zaheer. Why this double standards ?
Re: SACHIN MUST PLAY NATURAL GAME.CENTURY NOT IMPORTANT
by pravin sarode on Jul 29, 2011 05:15 PM
sachin neglects elders advice always as he neglected Atal Bihari Vajpeyi sir advice not to throw his valuable wicket in world cup 2003 sachin is like God Hanuman with curse of bowlers all over the world that he will forget his latent skills like Hanuman forgot his skill to fly indian ocean to search sita devi in Ramayan Hanuman just sit on rock and relaxed as sachin just sit in wimboldon tennis court and fix the matches with bookies?
