Re: Re: Biased people
by Ram on Jul 13, 2011 08:56 AM
Murali at least got 800 wickets against his name. Where is Bhajji? can't compare Bhajji and Murali.
Re: idea behind karnataka girls marriage and their thinking
by Srihari on Jul 12, 2011 12:06 PM
Well said,but i do not agree with your pt#8...those who have come from a good family backgrnd can never do tat sought of a thing..please try to give some respect to women as well..even they need somee security...may be IT/BPO is fine
Re: idea behind karnataka girls marriage and their thinking
by Srihari on Jul 12, 2011 12:08 PM
Never do mention whether its Karnataka or Delhi..in general when something ruins there lives,all women go for security which is pretty obvious...
Re: idea behind karnataka girls marriage and their thinking
by Geetha C on Jul 12, 2011 12:07 PM
dont think like that, even AP, TN, Kerala or any other state will do this.
Re: idea behind karnataka girls marriage and their thinking
by Srihari on Jul 12, 2011 12:09 PM
Your name suggests what you are...so guys its better not to reply to his msg anymore...
Till Sehwag recovers the best 11 option for the first test against England are Gambhir, Dravid as an openers, Laxman, Tendulkar, Yuvraj, Raina, Dhoni, Harbhajan, Praveen, Zaheer and Ishant.
Re: Indian team 11 for Lords Test
by J ADITYA on Jul 12, 2011 04:38 PM
I would rather have Rohit Sharma or Vijay play in place Yuvi and put them for opening along with Gambhir. Rahul is too precious to be used as an opener.
Harbhajan Singh is overbowled, stale and jaded. He is one the guys playing in all forms of cricket for the BCCI, be it Tests, ODIs or T20. All opposition teams have now worked him out and he seems short of fresh ideas. IN South Africa and in the West Indies one saw him bowl all through to defensive set fields even when the side was in a winning situation and needed Bhajji to get the vital last breakthroughs. Possibly Dhoni too is undertsnading the issue, so even when the opposition tail enders are batting he employs defensive fields when Bhajji is bowling instead of attacking with 7-8 fielders around the bat as would normally be expected in such situations and under the given conditions which were favourable to a bowler like Bhajji.
Re: Mr. Ian Bishop
by SG on Jul 12, 2011 11:28 AM
Yes, if viru were there, if sachin were there, if zaheer were there, if GOD were there, etc, etc - it would have been 3-0 for India. I absolutely agree with you. However, Steve Waugh's Aus or Clive Lloyd's WI never had to use the word "if". They showed us what true champions meant and how they used to systematically bulldoze their opponents.
Re: Re: Mr. Ian Bishop
by Venugopalan on Jul 12, 2011 11:55 AM
steve waqugh, clive lloyd, viv. richards were all superman rest are human beings...they (supermen) are invisible...right..?
Re: Mr. Ian Bishop
by gottachange on Jul 12, 2011 10:56 PM
If I was PM, then i would have made you president!..got the logic...
If and buts are for excuse givers..The fact is the guy could not bowl when all odds were aginst the WI, the situation was a bowler's dream,, our guy let us down BIIIIIGGG TIMMMEEE!!
Perhaps Bishop is talking about Harbhajan's batting form. The ace spinner could not take 9th wicket in West Indies' 2nd innings on a turning track for 3 hours, and that is his peak bowling form.
