Discussion Board

Thrashings add to case for a slimmed-down Cup


Total 37 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2
Kiran Ranganathan
Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of team.
by Kiran Ranganathan on Feb 21, 2011 12:37 PM  | Hide replies

Please pay close attention to Gavaskar's comments, he was just speaking of Sehwag thinking of 200 and kohli thinking of 100 and Ravisastri also was repeating the same. But truth was both of them were playing for the team and please don't infuse this records virus in next gen cricketers- let them play for the team like australians do.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Raju
Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of te
by Raju on Feb 21, 2011 12:53 PM
What's wrong in getting records as long as they are also winning ? Would you refuse a bonus for working extra hours at the office and tell the boss its just my job and I dont want any more money ? Dont be a hypocrite.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raj dsouza
Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of te
by raj dsouza on Feb 21, 2011 02:59 PM
well said Kiran ! Good observation !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sakar panch
Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of te
by sakar panch on Feb 21, 2011 01:02 PM
They are two of the most useless commentators. Shows Indian culture of going by ignoring merit based selections. Star Ckt were allowed to only select Ravi Sastri, Gavaskar and Manjerakar (all bombay folks) as commentators.

One wonders why the better (entertaining) commentators like Arun Lal and Sivaramakrishnan not been taken in! Do we see the pattern emerging?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
shubasrikrishna
Re: Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not o
by shubasrikrishna on Feb 21, 2011 02:16 PM
Raju you not getting the point what Kiran is saying.
It is the focus.. They always focus on Individual centuries. I see this not once , on many occasions. The focus should be on the teams victory and not on centuries. Manjrekar is also like that... Probably Marathi blood.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
santosh deshpande
Re: Re: Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s n
by santosh deshpande on Feb 21, 2011 05:58 PM
Mr subhakrishna, u useless south indian, dont promote regionalism. U might be south indian as your name suggests. I've been to south india & I,ve seen d way u beha=ve with ppl fom other states. And most imp thng, maharashtra has d max number of ppl who have come from other states tht emphasises the fact tht marathi ppl have always shown gratitude towards ppl from other & wud continue to do tht in d future. U better understnd it, u useless south indian

   Forward   |   Report abuse
santosh deshpande
Re: Re: Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s n
by santosh deshpande on Feb 21, 2011 05:51 PM
Mr subhakrishna, u useless south indian, dont promote regionalism. U might be south indian as your name suggests. I've been to south india & I,ve seen d way u beha=ve with ppl fom other states. And most imp thng, maharashtra has d max number of ppl who have come from other states tht emphasises the fact tht marathi ppl have always shown gratitude towards ppl from other & wud continue to do tht in d future. U better understnd it, u useless south indian

   Forward   |   Report abuse
santosh deshpande
Re: Re: Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s n
by santosh deshpande on Feb 21, 2011 05:51 PM
Mr subhakrishna, u useless south indian, dont promote regionalism. U might be south indian as your name suggests. I've been to south india & I,ve seen d way u beha=ve with ppl fom other states. And most imp thng, maharashtra has d max number of ppl who have come from other states tht emphasises the fact tht marathi ppl have always shown gratitude towards ppl from other & wud continue to do tht in d future. U better understnd it, u useless south indian

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not o
by Against Pseudos on Feb 21, 2011 05:06 PM
Shubasrikrishna:

No problem. ICC will review your expert comments and award the match to Bangladesh. You rightly pointed out that since none of their batsmen scored century they must be declared the automatic winners. ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
raj dsouza
Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of te
by raj dsouza on Feb 21, 2011 02:59 PM
well said Kiran ! Good observation !

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Varun
Re: Gavaskar-Sastri always speaking of records and 100s not of te
by Varun on Feb 21, 2011 02:41 PM
Everybody does. Sehwag and kohli not worried about records is nice fantasy, but hardly the truth. It is not sachin alone.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Innocent Saint
.
by Innocent Saint on Feb 21, 2011 12:16 PM

A,Coward,name,Cow ..changin,name,and,abusing ,other..he is porkistani or bangaldeshi

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PARAS jadhav
SHOULD PLAY MORE THAN 16 TEAMS
by PARAS jadhav on Feb 21, 2011 11:25 AM  | Hide replies

IN WORLD CUP THERE MUST BE MORE THAN 16 TEAMS THAN ONLY ITS LOOK LIKE A WORLD CUP, OTHER WISE IT LOOK LIKE A SERIAL

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: SHOULD PLAY MORE THAN 16 TEAMS
by Against Pseudos on Feb 21, 2011 11:44 AM
Jadhav:

Well said...

Maybe the FIRST Ever Cricket World Cup might be held some time soon.... :)

But thanks for pointing out that Kapil's devils won nothing more than a Serial.... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kiran Ranganathan
Re: Re: SHOULD PLAY MORE THAN 16 TEAMS
by Kiran Ranganathan on Feb 21, 2011 12:35 PM
you are Porkistani or a bandladesi.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: SHOULD PLAY MORE THAN 16 TEAMS
by Against Pseudos on Feb 22, 2011 03:38 AM
Kiran:

Given that your reading and comprehension skills are virtually non-existant, how does it matter what you think I am? :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sakar panch
Re: SHOULD PLAY MORE THAN 16 TEAMS
by sakar panch on Feb 21, 2011 01:04 PM
16 is ok. But it should be knock out like Grand Slam Tennis.

Are you ready?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 37 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2
Write a message