There are so many cities who can host the world cup with proper security...why the BCCI is biased...Nagpur is RSS Camp and Ahmedabad is Modi's Camp..why no matches in hyderabad,vizag,orissa and other venues
Re: why only NAGPUR & AHMEDABAD
by knightrider on Mar 06, 2011 12:44 PM
world cup has to be showcased in the best stadiums and venues , if these cities wanna host matches they better come up with better facilities. gud to showcase the best india has in such occasions what do u think ??
everything seems like a big pre-setup.Pawar and co is trying to make a leeway for india.that's y they say "Money is honey dear".i want to see India a champ. but not like this.
Re: This is not call a tournament...
by knightrider on Mar 06, 2011 12:42 PM
if australia and south africa can prepare fast bouncy pitches for us and win matches then y cant we , its called HOME ADVANTAGE my dear learn to use it for ur own gud ....
Re: In Case
by Ranvijay on Feb 18, 2011 05:37 PM
Sri Lanka, on the other hand, will play their final eight match in Colombo on March 26, unless they face India. In such a scenario India will get pre-tournament seeding preference and will play in Ahmedabad.
