Focus should be on World Cup and not Sachin: Kirmani

Re: @ PJ by suppandi on Feb 11, 2011 12:00 PM :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: @ PJ by Purani Jeans on Feb 11, 2011 12:07 PM media must outside training session everyday...every media company wants an exclusive interview with dhoni (captain of Indian cricket team)...and once media people find him..he cant ignore them..or else later media will say dhoni is proud blaah blaah    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: @ PJ by Purani Jeans on Feb 11, 2011 12:06 PM - he is captain of Team India so media is always after him.... players always give interview... its upto media how much to show..... - do you think other team dont give interviews...they also give....it must be published in their respective countries and per the madness they have about this game..    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: S/Finals by vndobell on Feb 11, 2011 11:53 AM SL have a big time advantage to play all the matches in lanka only,,,i have a doubt on England    Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Re: S/Finals by Sachin Gondhalekar on Feb 11, 2011 11:52 AM feel remove India and England as consistency matters and include South Africa and Sri Lanka in your list    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: S/Finals by Bada Bhai on Feb 11, 2011 11:57 AM Well Sachin I would have agreed to your opinion...but then this what I felt considering the form of the teams I chose and the fact that Pakistan being match-winners and highly unpredictable..if they have a couple of matches badly going..then you may include Sri Lanka or South Africa    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: S/Finals by Bada Bhai on Feb 11, 2011 12:00 PM I ahve included India because they are a tough team to beat at home..that is why I felt that going by history..India has tried to reach semifinals whenever they played in India or in neighbouring countries..Australians are known fighters you can't write them off..England is a well balanced fighting unit    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: IMO by Purani Jeans on Feb 11, 2011 11:49 AM Viv Richards is ahead of sachin    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: IMO by Naalayak Chhokra on Feb 11, 2011 12:13 PM At that time there was no Sachin. Had there been.. Viv and Brian Lara would fight and Sachin wud rule :-D    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: before by Purani Jeans on Feb 11, 2011 11:49 AM rediff is talking not dhoni    Forward   |   Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: only kapil';s view is sensible by dhruv kumar on Feb 11, 2011 11:45 AM what do u mean by greatest batsman? in terms of number of centuries? that is not great, he has played for 21yrs, if pointing/kallis play for some more time, they will break it    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: only kapil';s view is sensible by Chirag P on Feb 11, 2011 11:47 AM Ponting and Kallis are also Greatest batsmen of the Sachin's Era.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: only kapil';s view is sensible by dhruv kumar on Feb 11, 2011 11:50 AM correct, pointing and kallis contribution to cricket is much more than sachin as they play more than one role and they have been succesfull    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: only kapil';s view is sensible by Chirag P on Feb 11, 2011 11:54 AM look...more contribution thing is like Infinite in the Cricket....and yes Kallis is not greatest than Ponting and Ponting is not greatest than Kallis..both are unique...no need to make u understand more by saying who is greatest than Sachin..I think u understood well now :-) Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: only kapil';s view is sensible by Evil Vampire on Feb 11, 2011 11:44 AM i agree suppu    Forward   |   Report abuse