Whenever he tries to help anybody they are sure to be doomed. Remember Irfan? He is the one who ruined the career of his brother Trevor Chappel by asking him to bowl underarm. I hope Auusie BOYS take his advice seriously. They are sure to be walloped.
i wish Chappel does that and so australia lose their natches because he was one of the coaches who never understood the capabilities of the players unlike John Wright and Kirsten. He was always a headstrong a-- ho-e.
Whenever Chappell has tried helping a team it has failed. Hope Aus learn from earlier mistake by taking advice during Ashes in 2010. An arrogant man like him will only bring doom to his friends.
Our team should not worry. Chappel had tried to end career of Sachin while he was our coach. Chappel era has ended, but Sachin is still going strong. Why worry about Chappel's advice? It is nothing but new tactics of Oz side to pressurize Indians, since their verbal attack on ground may not be able to distract Indians. We have seen such Created News spreading when our team visited Oz soil. So not to worry but concentrate only on practice & game.
Ugly side of having a foreign coach. No words can make Aussies perform unless they show commitment on field. moreover, this could increase indian resilience
Sachin is a bundle of nerves right now dreaming of his 100th century. He will be a sitting duck. The main threats would be VVS, Dravid and Sehwag. Sachin scores or not, it usually does not impact the result much. Sehwag can change the game in India's favor in a single session and Dravid can play against all odds to draw from difficult situations and VVS can win by playing well with the tail in 4th innings. This has been the story of Indian cricket in the last 10 years.
Re: What's there to demystify
by raja on Dec 17, 2011 03:25 PM
that is why we won 4-0 in england irrespective of dravid scoring 3 centuries, that is why laxman fares pathetically in english, south african countries is int it jaya
Re: What's there to demystify
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 18, 2011 01:33 AM
very well said, Jaya S...nothing left to demystify sachin....
it is dravid, laxman, sehwag, gambhir that aussies should be wary of...look at our wins against the aussies in the last decade...it is about these players and our bowlers, not sachin...
Re: Re: What's there to demystify
by Against Pseudos on Dec 19, 2011 11:26 AM
Vaidya:
Aussies as usual are 1d10ts to master someone who - according to your immense wisdom exceeding that of Rohit Sharma's - is already mastered by the Aussies... :)
Re: yeah
by Saroj Dash on Dec 17, 2011 03:10 PM
a person with weakness has score 30k runs ... may be all agaianst minnows... gguys please wake up and smell the coffee!
Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Against Pseudos on Dec 18, 2011 03:41 AM
:-). You are absolutely right. When Sachin scored, there was no pressure. Only after he left India came under pressure. :-)
Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 18, 2011 10:22 AM
pseudo: ok, lets have it your way for the sake of argument...''after'' sachin was got out india came ''under pressure'' and other players delivered more often than not and we won or saved the match...as a result of which whenever we have won or saved the match under pressure it is usually other 10 players performances which catch the eye and sachin's failure at such times all the more glaring...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 19, 2011 06:48 AM
Pseudo, yes, BTW Sachin IS MORE experienced than Rohit. And it is just a coincidence that i am ''vehemently'' defending rohit. it could have been anybody else. he naded rohit so i defended rohit, if he had said, kohli, raina, jadeja, pathan i would have defended them. the point is i was not defending them but i was telling abhijit nair that whoever the cricketer in question he would be MORE qualified than nair to SPEAK on cricket issues...of course whether he is correct or not is a totally different issue...it is ok if nair does not agree with rohit but he cant say who cares about rohit's views and what right he has to speak....just the same as i may not agree with sachin but of course sachin is MORE qualified than me to speak on cricket issues...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Against Pseudos on Dec 19, 2011 11:27 AM
Vaidya:
Thanks for clarifying once and for all that Sachin is more experienced than YOU in cricketing matters, and contrary to whatever YOU might think, it will do us all good to abide by Sachin's judgment in cricketing matters such as shot selections, pacing his innings and deciding how many runs he scores for India... :)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Against Pseudos on Dec 19, 2011 03:25 AM
Vaidya:
Secondly, are you saying that your super "Other 10" have usually failed us innumerable times in finals - which you have been trying to fob off as Sachin's failures? :) BTW, what was Hyderabad - Sachin's fighting 175 and India still go down? What was England match in WC 2011? Sachin's ton, and India barely tied the match. And before you start crying "personal records", please remember Rahul Dravid's three tons in England and India's "pathetic" performance...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 19, 2011 07:07 AM
Pseudo: nowhere have said that it was ONLY sachin's failure ALWAYS. of course others have also failed many times. but while their failures are acknowledged and accepted many people refuse to acknowledge and accept sachin's failures...:)
yes for 175 runs (a very rare gem, laxman plays such types of innings day in and day out in tests (and usually also finsihes well) i give sachin 10 out of 10 on performance but 0 out of 10 as regards to ''finishing''...like i have said before pseudo, you put sachin in the same position again and again and sachin will get out on 175 7-8 times out of 10 and endanger india's prospect of wins...put people like dhoni, yuvraj, raina and they will help india win 7-8 times out of 10 and remain not out till the end...thats the difference between sachin and the winners like laxman, dhoni, yuvraj and others (the other 10 players)...the indians tied the Eng match in wc 2011 yes, but it was a flat pitch and even 350 runs were gettable...
and let me tell you ONCE again i never cried/harped about ''personal records'' ever...i have always talked about his nerves while playing under difficult situations...so please dont frame ME for other perople's accusations...:)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: yeah
by Sunil Vaidya on Dec 19, 2011 11:14 PM
Pseudo: As per your own logic Dhoni is more experienced than YOU in cricketing matters, and contrary to whatever YOU might think, it will do us all good to abide by Dhoni's judgment in cricketing matters such as shot selections, pacing his innings and deciding how many runs he scores for India... :)
Re: yeah
by Against Pseudos on Dec 19, 2011 11:30 AM
Varun:
Excellent point.
The bowlers worldover are really really lucky... If Sachin didn't have those "well known" weaknesses, he'd have reached 500 centuries and 100000 runs by now, a feat which all those 300 batsmen from Bangladesh, Australia, England and India have already achieved... :)
