Top performers in Tests in 2011

Re: hi by vishal kcs on Aug 27, 2011 04:32 PM i think u are mad these is this years record ok check the 20 years record and u will know the facts    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 27, 2011 05:09 PM | Hide message vishal kcs. it is YOU who is made. i know the records. YOU need to check them. please go through the records of the last 20 years and if your eyes and brain are proper working condition you will understand that i am correct...
Re: Re: Re: hi by Against Pseudos on Aug 29, 2011 04:48 AM Sunil Vaidya: Please check your eyes, brains, heart and lungs, and THEN tell us which other batsman has consistently featured in the Top 10 list for the last 20 years continuously? :) And oh, thanx for telling us that Rahul Dravid is one of the poorest batsmen alive today... coz when I applied your same logic (that you used against Sachin) I found that Rahul Dravid fantards need to check their eyes brains and kidneys as well... :) P.S.: I am NOT a blind Dravid hater like you are a Sachin hater. And I think both Rahul and Sachin are really great cricketers. But Sachin hatred fantards will hardly understand such feelings... :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 29, 2011 11:22 AM | Hide message pseudo: you just dont understand. sachin, vvs, dravid are ALL dedicated cricketers and nobody cares about personal records. they are all team players and always care for india to do well.... but if you feel that they play for personal records, i am sorry there is nothing more i can say about that...:)
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 29, 2011 11:48 AM | Hide message pseudo: i got your point. and i think that your claim that sachin is among the top 10 batsmen in the world as the lists claim is very reasonable...:) well at last (and at least) you agree that there 9 batsmen who are as good or better than sachin...that itself is a BIG concession...:) Though it IS a comedown from your previous claim that sachin is THE greatest batsman in the world...:)
Re: hi by Rohit Jain on Aug 29, 2011 03:24 PM very very true dear.... he always play for money and for himself only    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: hi by Against Pseudos on Aug 29, 2011 04:46 AM Sunil Vaidya: :) And what have YOU proven? That he was the ONLY batsman featuring in such lists for the last 20 years? Name another one please... :) And thanx for telling that Rahul Dravid is a very poor batsman, by your same logic... :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 29, 2011 11:35 AM | Hide message pseudo, you are incorrigible. i have now started to become impatient whenever i read your posts or whenever i have to reply to you. you just dont understand what i am saying...:) if you really think dravid, sachin vvs play for records and dont care about india win there is no use continuing our repartees. ..:) you think whoever makes 16000 runs in 400 matches is better than somebody who makes 8000 runs in 200 matches and they both are better players than somebody who makes 4000 runs in 100 matches...:) you think that whoever takes 1000 wickets in 100 matches is better than somebody who takes 900 wickets in 90 matches and better than somebody who takes 800 wickets in 80 matches... ok so you be happy with your views and i will be happy with my views...:) it is now getting really boring and tiring for me to just post witty or sarcastic comments withtout any sort of meaningful exchange...:)
Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 29, 2011 07:35 PM Frankly speaking, Dhoni is the best batsman for India as on today. You Sachin fantards have nothing but curses on the rest. Again i am telling, I dont hate Sachin. But i hate his fans who give him all credit for his failures and others' successes.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 29, 2011 11:55 PM | Hide message hey hey you fake your pathetic attempts to discredit me are really amusing...
Re: Re: Re: hi by stockstalks on Aug 31, 2011 01:19 AM Sunil, 400 Matches 16k Runs 200 Matches 8k Runs 100 Matches 4k Runs if somebody scores 41 Runs in 1 Match or 410 Runs in 10 Match, will you give him the certificate of Greatest Player of the Century?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 31, 2011 10:29 AM | Hide message stockstalks, if somebody makes 41 in 1 match wait till he finishes his 10 matches and then when he also makes 410 runs (or maybe even more) like the other guy scratch your head and try to decide who is the greatest... btw please also look in which conditions one guy made 41 in 1 match and the other guy made 410 in 10 matches. if the guy making 410 opens the batting and makes all those runs under good conditions and fails in critical conditions and the other guy who makes 41 runs makes it in crunch situation and comes low down the order and when not many balls or wickets are left i will rate the player who has played only 1 match higher than somebody who has played more matches and played in his comfort zone... i hope that answers your quesion...
Message awaiting moderator review. |  Show message Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: hi by Sunil Vaidya on Aug 31, 2011 11:45 AM | Hide message BTW stockstalks, if somebody scores 6000 runs in 166 innings and other scores 6000 runs in 169 innings, which one will you call the greater/better batsman? to which one will you give the certificate of greatest player of the century?
Message deleted by moderator