for you country does not matter. what matters is ICC controlling and directing Angrez country that does it all from underhands, including setting the schedules.
Afterall, Tednulkar also sold out desh to videshi technology dominance through DRS. Not ot deny that rest of nation is sold out as well to such dominance be it weapons or biz tech.
angrez are studying indians in these practice games, BY versing team worse than bangladesh to do their planning off desi exposure, india certainly needs practice. Can they avoid being exposed, did india ask how the angrez in Kent match were attaking stums by missing bat to get those bold out or snicks.
get sehwag back, he was getting back in form and they sent him back. SEHWAG WAS SENT BACK to much of relief of sweet laced poison like boycott.Get Rahul sharma and pragyan ojha for T20 and therafter if they do well.
Re: tendulkar is included to prove that dismal performance
by D S on Aug 28, 2011 08:22 AM
even the person who sits behind DRS button in ICC appointed. icc paid umpires and DRS are agressive against Asia when they play ghoras to save their job and be awarded by more assignments. Look at how Assad was ageessive against Malinga and favor Aussie batting. Who sits behind DRS is ICC person and so is DRS an ICC toy. How DRS favoured Peitersen in first test to give him double century was PURE CHEAT.
Re: why?
by Against Pseudos on Aug 29, 2011 11:39 AM
Maybe his 203 against Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka, 214 against Australia in India, 111* against South Africa in South Africa and 146 against South Africa in South Africa was viewed by Clive Lloyd and others as something worth considering? :) An average of 63.25 also would have helped his cause greatly, I believe... :)
