india is cricket and cricket is india if indian team will lose, nobody will watch cricket and all money sponsorship will be gone. the likes of chappel and boycott will have to beg money to earn their living. indian players and board all multi millionaires. they dont give a damn
Re: Re: india is cricket
by Aishrya R on Aug 17, 2011 09:58 AM
you should know that your country didn't even change the railway track or trains that was provided by them ... India still have trains becasue of british rule, else you will still be travellign in bullock cart... so don't leave such stupid comments about begging and all... anything we use has a Gora influence, including your computer,keyboard,OS,the English that you speak...
Re: Re: Re: india is cricket
by ramesh on Aug 17, 2011 06:05 PM
haha.wtf the england people talk about us. you robbed all our money and helped only 10 % .and u became rich because of us .and taking about us .
why does he have to target Raina now, we know Raina was doing very well with 1 dayers until they shuffled him into test. Raina is improving his spin as well.
"Kapil slams Dhoni, seniors for not motivating youngsters" All the seniors want to secure their slot, look at tendulkar and gang have done to Kohli and Rohit. Look at what was done by selectors lobby to RP Singh who was most suited for England after zaheer. Look at how they pushed Mishra when pragyan and rohit are dual spin attack that would have stalled Angrez run chase because angrez are more used to pace and certain style of spin that Harbhajan and Mishra practice. this is why Pragyan was called to country in AngrezLand to get used to him and analyse him.
Re: ..
by D S on Aug 16, 2011 09:16 PM
correction - pragyan and rahul are dual spin attack that would have stalled Angrez run chase because angrez are more used to pace and certain style of spin that Harbhajan and Mishra practice.
players like rahul to stop T20 run chase at will by braod, prior, bell, etc.
Re: Re: Re: england performance
by ramesh on Aug 17, 2011 06:02 PM
where are you ? when your country lose against us in 2008 with 5-0 ,and 1-0 in 2007 .and not win a single world cup .first time u beat us after 5 years .for one time only this much of build up aa.wtf.haha
Re: Who cares, we want SRT 100th record!
by shanavas mohammed on Aug 16, 2011 11:09 PM
sad...ur attempt failed once again to create a clash btw sachin and antisachin group...v ol knw which side u belongs to....u cnt even touch him by any means
Dhoni's so-called tactics never worked because honestly speaking, Dhonee never had any tactic at all...it was one or the other player performing in the last 3 years...Sehwag in tests, Gambhir in 2009, Kohli in ODI's this year, Raina sometime before that, Yuvraj Singh in world cup etc....That's why India won matches in the last few years.......And not because of any captaincy...captaincy is a big lie which has been perpetrated by the corrupt media...can you think beyond captaincy and count the no. of occassions when Dhoni's decision really made a difference?...if you look carefully, Dhoni had no contribution at all...Dhoni himself was the non-performer all along, quietly pocketing all glory heaped on him by a corrupt media for no reason at all...but this is where Dhoni's luck ends as it should because he is useless after all
Dhoni's so-called tactics never worked because honestly speaking, Dhonee never had any tactic at all...it was one or the other player performing in the last 3 years...Sehwag in tests, Gambhir in 2009, Kohli in ODI's this year, Raina sometime before that, Yuvraj Singh in world cup etc....That's why India won matches in the last few years.......And not because of any captaincy...captaincy is a big lie which has been perpetrated by the corrupt media...can you think beyond captaincy and count the no. of occassions when Dhoni's decision really made a difference?...if you look carefully, Dhoni had no contribution at all...Dhoni himself was the non-performer all along, quietly pocketing all glory heaped on him by a corrupt media for no reason at all...but this is where Dhoni's luck ends as it should because he is useless after all
