If it is in the spirit of the game, then why ICC with draw having runners for injured batsmen or bowlers to have drink during play? After all ICC is administering a " Gentleman;s Game".
Why should credit be given to both teams???? What did England do to credit them!!! Is it for booing India on a correct decision??? For not calling Indian Batsmen back when they were given out even though they were not??? For the Indian batsmen who gifted their wickets to the English bowlers??? For the English Player for skipping IPL and remaining fresh for National duty.... ah if so then they should be credited for.
Re: Why Both Teams?
by Against Pseudos on Aug 01, 2011 10:53 AM
Chris Alphonso:
Whilst you are absolutely right in asking the core question about Lorgat's comment praising England, I am curious as to where did you get the "..booing India on a correct decision.." from?
I thought it was the English fans who did the booing... and if so, Dhoni's gesture should have resulted in Lorgat praising YOU and me... :)
Re: Why Both Teams?
by chatter on Aug 01, 2011 11:51 AM
Harron Lorgat is the brown henchamn of the white masters. Therfore he had to give praise to the English team, the umoires, match refree and all. Otherwise what role had they to play in the whole matter ? Bell made a mistake and got out.
Re: ..
by D S on Aug 01, 2011 10:09 AM
Re: AMERICAN MENTALITY Vs loser INDIAN MENTALITY.
major,
angrez are clever, they recovered their losses by re-entry through Texas and through country in North. Also, angrez were silent players of EU and built hidden professional network (of what-ever ghoras control) to block desis and recruit those desis who are branded loyal sSlaves. they also feed misinformation to their broker indian companies like TATA who have sizable investment and contracts from angrez. Angrez also got entry to india by opening kickback account for jinnah, nehru and gandhi who were falsely branded as true desis by angrez media. Now videshis have multi-billion budget for spying (includes internet) almost everything and inject the media as them being innovation and techno-saviours, all their tech savvy has built junkyards around the world through their business and tech-brokers.
India has shown his Sportsmanship, but what about England Team. Stuart Broad has taken Ha-trick Wicket where Harbhajan Singh given absolutely disappointed.
Re: Sportsmanship
by D S on Aug 01, 2011 10:05 AM
firs they make you beggars by cheating and brutality , then the call us saint Gandhi. Whoow, the East India company docter. So many brokers angrez made among us who were called saints and true indians.
Re: Re: Sportsmanship
by D S on Aug 01, 2011 10:07 AM
then angrez brokers jinnah, nehru and gandhi were projected as true desis by angrez media while kickback accounts were opened for many of them. angrez had vengeance against americans in 1947 so they advise nehru to join Russians. all blocks are connected to one another for same goals and that includes the friendly iIsreal.
Re: Sportsmanship
by selvakumar on Aug 01, 2011 10:28 AM
If both captain running the match Then Why Required umpire,Third umpire,DRS, Rules regulations & Match refree.where is the sportmanship from england
