if you have any knowledge of how cricket is played and how runs are scored then please listen to me, you may call him the best or god or whatever but for the basic knowledge of cricket don't compare him to Don Bradman. You can compare him to Sunil Gavaskar or Ricky Ponting or Sehwag but have some sense and please spare the great Don.
Facts: Sachin has 48 ODI centuries. India won 33 out of those matches, lost 13, 1 tie and 1 no-result.
So not sure how people draw the opposite co-relations. Perhaps they remember the matches where he scores runs and India loses, and not when he scores and India wins - which is more often as obvious from the stats.
Another inference can be drawn that he is consistent, and does his job of making runs.
Re: Sachin centuries and Indian victories - ODI
by coolmrrocky1981@rediffmail.com on Apr 19, 2011 12:12 AM
Sachin is a Batsman so he Scores Run… Bt if India lose because of Bad Bowling & Fielding then how this is his Fault… what the other 10 were doing … Why Other didn’t perform on all favorable condition plus, at very good run rate… 6 of them fell when they have full chance to play…. Stop criticizing to sum one who is really playing for India
Re: Sachin centuries and Indian victories - ODI
by coolmrrocky1981@rediffmail.com on Apr 19, 2011 12:13 AM
Sachin is a Batsman so he Scores Run… Bt if India lose because of Bad Bowling & Fielding then how this is his Fault… what the other 10 were doing … Why Other didn’t perform on all favorable condition plus, at very good run rate… 6 of them fell when they have full chance to play…. Stop criticizing to sum one who is really playing for India
he has to probe himself why it always happening for his team. where as valthaty hits, team wins. anyways, sachin's poor captancy resulted in the loss during last game (when he hit 100), he did not know how use the bowlers appropriately
Re: SACHIN
by Gladiator on Apr 18, 2011 09:20 AM
Thats a shame on his team members and not him...If your father all his life earns the bulk of income to support your family, and you instead of supporting him at this age, spent his earning on your needless requirements, than its a shame on you and not on him...Hope you got my point.
He is pretty good form compared to V Kohli. Lot of partiality is there in Indian team as well these article. I dont understand whith out including Rayudu, you guys mentioned Vkohli, he made only one half century where as Rayudu made two half centuries. Rayudu Avg and strike rate is much better than v Kohli. He is the most deserved player should paly for Indian team, Initially because of Hyd team (shiv lal yadav-idiot ) he had troble because shiv lal wants to include/projrct his stupid dum son in the team.
Guys! see the statastics of Rayudu, he don't had any god father may be thats the reason still Indian team is not taking him.
Re: How about MI Player Rayudu ?
by sunil nair on Apr 17, 2011 08:16 PM
Rayudu played in the ICL which was banned by BCCI and ICC . He left it along with a few players under an amnesty deal by which those players could not play domestic cricket for 1 more year and international cricket for 3 years . Thats why he played in IPL only from 2010 ( after the domestic ban was over ) . He will be eligible to play for the country from this year onwards and with his talent I feel he will get his chance . As for the table above you must be referring to the most runs table . Kohli has scored more runs overall eventhough he has one less fifty . If you want the full tables check in cricinfo .
