1.They called Randiv in place of Mathews and played him in place of Herath . They know that Randiv has a good record against India. If you are picking 16 players it means you have replacements for atleast one injury. You are picking perera for Mathews than why call Randiv.Cheated but it backfired
2.Bowl has been changed in 34th over but again Jayawardene call for change in 44th over as he knows that in powerplay if Zaheer gets reverse swing it will be impossible for them to score.
Re: Srilanka is cheater
by sachin agrawal on Apr 06, 2011 04:40 AM
And I have more to add - If you haven't watched how Murali got his 800th test wicket, find the video and watch it. Mahela claimed a catch which probably wasn't taken cleanly.h
Re: Re: Srilanka is cheater
by sachin agrawal on Apr 06, 2011 04:45 AM
Murali had been bowling nonstop from one end for atleast 25 overs and wasn't being able to take the last Indian wicket. In 10 more overs the match was headed for a draw. And he had already declared it as his last test. Desperation, frustration and other emotions like this were written all over his and Sangakkara's face. In those circumstances, Mahela did what Srilankans do best - HE CHEATED AND CLAIMED A CATCH THAT WAS NOT CLEANLY TAKEN. AND NOBODY PROTESTED COZ IT WAS THE LAST WICKET AND EVERYBODY WANTED MURALI TO HAVE HIS 800th AS A GESTURE OF GOODWILL OR SOMETHING.
Re: Re: Re: Srilanka is cheater
by sachin agrawal on Apr 06, 2011 04:50 AM
AND RANDIV RECEIVED A 1 OR 2 MATCH BAN AFTER HE ADMITTED THAT DILSHAN HAD TOLD HIM TO BOWL THE NO BALL. I FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT SANGA OR MAHELA DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT. THEY KNEW AND THEY WERE IN ON IT. CHEATERS. THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF CHEATERS.
Re: Re: Re: Srilanka is cheater
by sachin agrawal on Apr 06, 2011 04:49 AM
AND RANDIV RECEIVED A 1 OR 2 MATCH BAN AFTER HE ADMITTED THAT DILSHAN HAD TOLD HIM TO BOWL THE NO BALL. I FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT SANGA OR MAHELA DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT IT. THEY KNEW AND THEY WERE IN ON IT. CHEATERS. THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF CHEATERS.
Re: toss
by mahesh gupta on Apr 05, 2011 01:10 PM
Its not about Gandhian policy. Two are the honored players and experienced captains. So they cant behave like street cricketers. So that was the best choice at that but no doubt that sanga should have maintained dignity
Re: Sangakara
by aaaa bbbb on Apr 05, 2011 01:06 PM
even dilshan is an ungrateful devil...here he makes money and when india toured srilanka he was cheating...
this would have become a huge issue India failed in chasing 275. In the hindsight, it was a good toss to lose as there was dew in the evening and Lankan spinners were finding it difficult to spin the ball. Had dhoni won the toss he would also batted first and who knows what would have happened?
