Had it been an Indian, Australian media would have really pounced upon that and would have highlighted it to the the hilt.
Only because he was not an Indian, they did not mention nationality to sell the story to Indian media, which it did.
Does any one really think that if it had been an Indian, they would have left out that important bit of information? Just saying "an Indian was involved" would have sold their story many a times, but they did not do it.
I assume most of you would have read this article of The Australian.
"Two IPL officials from India independently verified that a leading batsman had played so suspiciously that they could not explain his behaviour."
"One of the officials claimed that the player's performances were "puzzling", particularly scoring slowly towards the end of an innings when the opposite should have been happening.
He consistently under-performed and often appeared uninterested or distracted."
Re: Who is he?
by Sports Lover on Sep 10, 2010 03:35 PM
Yuvraj really didn't stay till the end of any match if I remember correctly. So it must be someone else.
