WASIM AKRAM IS IN THE FIRST 11 AND McRATH IS NOT EVEN IN THE SECOND ELEVEN???? NO MODERN TIME BATSMAN HAS A GOOD RECORD AGAINST McGRATH AND THAT INCLUDES MY FAVOURITE CRICKETER OF ALL TIME...SACHIN TENDULKAR. HE MOSTLY GOT THE BETTER OF LARAS ,TENDULKARS AND INZAMAMS
Re: McGRATH
by kamesh warman on Oct 25, 2010 06:51 PM
once on a reply note to Mcgrath for making him go a duck in 1999 world cup super six match...sachin replied him in the next meets where in he replied a 19 run over which include a unbelivable flat six to midon on a good length ball..
Re: McGRATH
by Arpit Patel on Oct 25, 2010 06:39 PM
you are wrong. Sachin is the only batsmen that Mcgrath didn't get better off. In the 1990's Sachin took Mcgrath apart most times. Maybe you can say when Sachin was not at his best then Mcgrath got the best of Sachin.
Re: Re: Re: McGRATH
by Arpit Patel on Oct 25, 2010 08:45 PM
no way. You are wrong too. When Mcgrath was at his best Sachin got better of him. When Sachin was injured and not at his best, Mcgrath got better of SRT.
Re: Re: McGRATH
by Atanu Chatterjee on Oct 25, 2010 07:19 PM
what yousaid is probably true about lara. Infact Mcgrath himself rated lara ahead of Sachin against his bowling...but then over-all Sachin definitely is the best of the era, if not all time.
Re: Re: Re: McGRATH
by Arpit Patel on Oct 25, 2010 08:46 PM
Mcgrath was a loser. He don't know who is great or not? One day he says Lara another day he says Tendulkar, the next time he says something else. So Mcgrath is a loser.
Re: McGRATH
by Sameer Gore on Oct 25, 2010 07:06 PM
McGrath got wickets not only because of his bowling skill, majority were due to verbal skills. And he got away every single time.. He would have half the wickets with verbal power
