If Garfield Sobers has been watching sachin since his induction as a baby boy cricketer,he should himself award Sachin as Sir Sachin Tendulkar,like once Donald Bradman invited him for the prolific trophy by his hands,we Indians are proud of his remarkable feat with abundance&composed energy he applies,salute to him.
Re: anybody wants to bet
by pranab roy on Oct 13, 2010 01:20 AM
insan(e) man should go to ranchi or agra.please go there.i will give you the traveeling charges but please spare us from your i.d.i.o.t.i.c comments.
Re: anybody wants to bet
by B M on Oct 13, 2010 07:05 AM
Sachin has already played a match winning knock in the 1st innings. Even if he does not bat well in the 2nd innings, he has done his job. The other 10 players also have to do their bit and not there just for sightseeing. Without his 214 in the first innings India would have already lost this match.
Re: Re: anybody wants to bet
by abc abc on Oct 13, 2010 08:33 AM
thats a good point san man. the above 2 replies are from people without cricketing information. ignore them and give them some contact number of doctor for checkup.
dear friends , yet again we saw what the dismissal of sachin results? total crumble. where r those nonsense people who yesterday said that sachin should play fast n other players will cooperate.see what happened after sachin gone .
Re: sachin the backbone
by san man on Oct 13, 2010 12:05 AM
anybody wants to bet that tendu the chicken will be unable to handle the pressure and fizzle out in the 2nd innings?
Re: Re: sachin the backbone
by pranab roy on Oct 13, 2010 01:25 AM
insan(e) man should go to ranchi or agra.please go there.i will give you the traveeling charges but please spare us from your i.d.i.o.t.i.c comments.
Re: sachin the genious
by Chuttad Prasad on Oct 12, 2010 10:26 PM
he is good for at least another 4-5 years in my opinion, but i bet if india wins wc, he will retire then and there
Re: Re: sachin the genious
by ganesh kumar on Oct 12, 2010 10:32 PM
india could not win a single medal in olympics becoz of u foolish people. praise sachin and cricket.
Re: Re: Re: sachin the genious
by Nagarajan N on Oct 12, 2010 10:38 PM
Sorry Ganesh, something is wrong with you. kindly consult a psychiatrist immediately.
Re: Re: Re: sachin the genious
by ankur820924@rediffmail.com on Oct 12, 2010 10:53 PM
boss if i have interest in your wife, can you STOP that NO, on similar grounds it's my life and i will decide if i watch cricket or gulli danda.
it's allmost an indian A team with most of the frontline batsmen and bowlers are rested..!!!!! it's going to be young indian team V/S AUS ..!!! most of the promising young players got the chance to play at highest competitive level against this AUS team, that's the good sign.... surprise inclusion.....rohith sharma..!!! exclusion....rahane...!!!
Re: Re: team for one dayers against AUS picked....
by ganesh kumar on Oct 12, 2010 10:33 PM
sachin always plays for himself not for the nation.he cannot be compared to sehwags adaptability to different conditions.sachin plays only for money.
Re: Re: Re: team for one dayers against AUS picked....
by Rajesh SHENOY on Oct 12, 2010 11:16 PM
why ? he asked money from you izzit? and refused to play b.coz u did not give him money? :)
Re: Re: Re: team for one dayers against AUS picked....
by sunny joseph on Oct 12, 2010 10:48 PM
So Sehwag not for money nor records Then why he was so upset over a missed century after the noball incident even though India won the match. Why he continued to bat with Rahul Dravid in spite of rain and no result was evident in a test match about a few years ago. The continued to bat only to break an old test partnership record. But Shewang was out 5 runs short of the record and the play was abandoned at that moment. Dear friend try to be neutral. Don;t simply criticise
Re: Re: Re: team for one dayers against AUS picked....
by Krishnan on Oct 12, 2010 11:17 PM
Why are you making stupid statements? Who scored 200, 183 Not out and 175 in One day. Your grand father?
I HOPE AND ALL WILL AGREE WITH ME, THE WAY SACHIN IS PLAYING FOR THE LAST 1 N 2 YEARS, IF HE HAD PLAYED LIKE THIS 05 YEARS BEFORE, HE WOULD HAVE ATLEAST 75 CENTURIES IN BOTH FORMATS OF CRICKET AND INDIA WOULD HAVE ITS SECOND WORLD CUP IN ITS POCKET.
Re: IFSACHIN COULD HAVE PLAYED LIKE THIS FIVE EARS BEFORE
by miviu on Oct 12, 2010 09:54 PM
bad patches during any player's life is common... especially when they play for longer duration. but its irrefutable that he is still the best batsman of India..
Re: IFSACHIN COULD HAVE PLAYED LIKE THIS FIVE EARS BEFORE
by shantharam rao on Oct 12, 2010 09:35 PM
Enough bad words were said about this great player during his lean period.When he score century all praise him.This is Indian mentality.We never appreciate.Only interested in criticising.
Umpiring was poor. Ponting was Plumb on 2 ocasions to Srishant. When the umpires are quick to refer to 3rd umpire for his no ball why did they not ask for his LBW appeal? may be they being fair skinned thought this to be 'unfair'?
Re: umpiring
by Sameer on Oct 14, 2010 09:14 AM
umpiring was not up t the mark, however lest you forget that ponting was wringly given out in the 1st inning
Re: umpiring
by sri on Oct 12, 2010 09:32 PM
Even the incompetant Kalmadi blames "white skin" for all the efficiency and refuses to accept that he did anything wrong! Time to start looking at our faults and stop seeing racism everywhere with our petty indian minds.
Re: worthless rediff
by cool dude on Oct 12, 2010 07:57 PM
However, after completing his double ton, Tendulkar didn't last long. He became the victim of the day and gave Peter George his maiden Test wicket when he played on a delivery on to his stumps.
i am sure rediff will also say brian lara could not make any addition to his score after reaching 400 runs.
Re: Re: worthless rediff
by miviu on Oct 12, 2010 09:58 PM
Lara scored 400, where the match was decided to be draw much before 5th day.... I think even England had put up healthy score then.. Here the result is still possible, and without sachin's knock, the series would have already been equal.
Re: Re: Re: worthless rediff
by Sameer on Oct 14, 2010 09:15 AM
no actually, lara's 400 runined WI chance of getting a result. After the match, his team mates and WI greats and other cricketing greats critisized lara for going for the record, instead of the win
