Discussion Board View article

Total 49 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
Rajan S
We stand up and salute you, saurav
by Rajan S on Oct 09, 2010 08:04 PM

Retirement of saurav ganguly from international cricket, is one of the most disappointing losses for indian cricket. The passion and the attitude he brought to the game was beyond description. He was the one who changed the face of indian cricket and brought professionalism to our team. We salute you dada and u will always remain as one of our all time heroes

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sanjay Chetty
Dada, we owe it to you!
by Sanjay Chetty on Oct 07, 2010 02:25 PM

"The Indian cricket team is one of the biggest advertisements of Test cricket or any form of cricket at the present moment". And Dada, we owe a lot to you for making Indian team a worthy one! India's ressurection from match fixing shambles started when you took over. Dravid nurtured it, Kumble enhanced it, and finally Dhoni is enjoying it! We wont forget you Dada, you were simply superb, made this team feel that they are competitors. Bajji, Zaheer, Viru, Yuvi, Raina, all had disclosed that they were inspired by him at various points of their careers.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
priya
VVS, Really a special one?
by priya on Oct 07, 2010 12:37 PM  | Hide replies

I really dont understand a word " When Most Needed". Do u all mean to say in first inning it was not needed to bat with maturity to gain lead rather than giving away lead? During entire partnership with Ishant, they both faced abt 135 deliveries out of which Ishant faced 92. Why? Ishant should have been covered by VVS. It was a chance that LAxman took paid off by Ishant and everybody is going gaga over VVS

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sanjay Chetty
Re: VVS, Really a special one?
by Sanjay Chetty on Oct 07, 2010 02:17 PM
When most needed simple means that when others fail, he raised himself to the occassion. When all hits a 100, it may not be "when most needed" because score is coming even otherwise! In that sense, Laxman's 73 was indeed a "when most needed"!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SUNILKUMAR
VVS the great & dedicated Indian
by SUNILKUMAR on Oct 07, 2010 08:26 AM

The whole nation salute your brave character and effort for saving our great nation from the point of defeat. We are proud of you VVS.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kabothi Kumar
Bat for life.
by Kabothi Kumar on Oct 07, 2010 06:08 AM

If I want someone to bat for my life, it would be this guy and not that other "legend" ;-)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sachin
dhoni
by sachin on Oct 06, 2010 05:09 PM  | Hide replies

dhoni should be rested permanently... even zim wont select him in test match if he is not captain....shame!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sanjay Chetty
Re: dhoni
by Sanjay Chetty on Oct 07, 2010 02:19 PM
beta, captaincy matters! No normal captain would've brought back Ishant for a spell in the next 3 tests seeing his performance in the 1st innings and earlier part of the 2nd innings. But Dhoni brought him and result was there for you to see. 3, quick, important wickets! When you blame when India lose, laud him when we win

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kumar sumit
VVS
by kumar sumit on Oct 06, 2010 04:16 PM  | Hide replies

why Dhoni is not takin rest for a month...he knows ,as a captain he can earn all the credit with good team,without putting any effort...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sanjay Chetty
Re: VVS
by Sanjay Chetty on Oct 07, 2010 02:21 PM
Dont you blame the captain when the team is not performing? So converse is also true. See Ponting. Leading Australia was easy for Taylor and Waugh as they had a very good team. Not anymore, as Ponting finds it out.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
kumar sumit
VVS
by kumar sumit on Oct 06, 2010 04:03 PM  | Hide replies

u r a real champ man..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
priya
Re: VVS
by priya on Oct 07, 2010 12:55 PM
I really dont understand a word " When Most Needed". Do u all mean to say in first inning it was not needed to bat with maturity to gain lead rather than giving away lead? During entire partnership with Ishant, they both faced abt 135 deliveries out of which Ishant faced 92. Why? Ishant should have been covered by VVS. It was a chance that LAxman took paid off by Ishant and everybody is going gaga over VVS


   Forward   |   Report abuse
sudhakar gadiraju
Re: Re: VVS
by sudhakar gadiraju on Oct 07, 2010 05:10 PM
But VVS scored most of the runs at more than 100 strike rate

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kaka
Re: VVS
by Kaka on Oct 06, 2010 10:16 PM
No doubt, he is a champ in the truest sense, a man who gets runs when India needs them most. A man for crisis, he has become one of cricket's great miracle men who can win matches from nowhere. Bravo, VVS....!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
jithu
dada bhai
by jithu on Oct 06, 2010 02:23 PM

Danger is for One day internationals and not for Test matches. One dayers are becoming boring now a days after 20-20. Tests are ever interesting.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
bijo m
ONLY LAXMAN....NO ISHANT????
by bijo m on Oct 06, 2010 02:10 PM  | Hide replies

WHY ONLY LAXMAN???? WHY NOT ISHANT???? IF ISHANT WAS OUT, THEN THIS WHOLE ARTICLES WOULD'VE ENDED AND STARTED BARKING AGAINST THIS VVS AND WHOLE TEAM.....THIS IS MEDIA NOW!!!! PATHETIC

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Heramb Satghare
Re: ONLY LAXMAN....NO ISHANT????
by Heramb Satghare on Oct 06, 2010 06:43 PM
Completely agree, we are only concentrating on how well VVS & Ishant batted & saved the day but in al this euphoria we are forgetting that our batsmen did play awfully. The efforts of VVS, Ishant, Zaheer & Ojha are commendable but we are going overboard with it. We need to concentrate on why we needed to get to the last wicket to win the match.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Balvinder singh
Re: ONLY LAXMAN....NO ISHANT????
by Balvinder singh on Oct 06, 2010 03:00 PM
Very very good comments and its true

   Forward   |   Report abuse
priya
Re: ONLY LAXMAN....NO ISHANT????
by priya on Oct 07, 2010 12:56 PM
Yes i agre with you. I really dont understand a word " When Most Needed". Do u all mean to say in first inning it was not needed to bat with maturity to gain lead rather than giving away lead? During entire partnership with Ishant, they both faced abt 135 deliveries out of which Ishant faced 92. Why? Ishant should have been covered by VVS. It was a chance that LAxman took paid off by Ishant and everybody is going gaga over VVS


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 49 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message