Either OZ's will win or it will be a draw. No chance for India to win because Laxman is injured and India will have to bat last. Also India are without Sharma to bowl. Even Bhajji is not fully fit. How can Dhoni expect to win with 2 unfit players in side? India lost a great oppurtinity to win this test by including 2 injured players. And they say Dhoni is a great captain, unless this match is also fixed.
Re: Come out of Darkness, Enjoy the Pleasure of
by minakshi k on Oct 04, 2010 05:07 AM
want to be in india where west needs me most,want change but at the same time need doc report,dravid played well but not able tomake century to help other. need suggestion to play.
Re: sachin
by tendusach on Oct 04, 2010 01:58 AM
u r still in 90s when match fixers used 2 play....now the entire team plays...viru is the only batsman who can change he course of any match in the present Indian batting line up...
Re: sachin
by V on Oct 04, 2010 12:20 AM
Now its not like that,may be u r talking about the past when there were azhar jadeja manjrekar and all.Right now even if if he retires no body will bother except some hardcore Pujari type public, who easily make some one ideal and starts praying them. He has never been a match winner.. never...this is the only truth of Sachin
Re: Re: sachin
by sanath on Oct 04, 2010 12:48 AM
Dear V, When you are criticizing, could you also plz name apt replacements for Tendulkar, Dravid, Laxman ? This holds good for all who are criticizing him plz...name anybody who you think will be able to score prolifically for 10 years on the trot (leave alone 20 years) and score as much as these batsmen have.
Re: Re: sachin
by Ratikant Sahoo on Oct 04, 2010 09:38 AM
What is the meaning of match winner? Is it, when Australia make 300, Sachin must make 301st run? He comes to field when India score is 0 and he builds the innings. Unlike Yuvraj, Pointing, and others who usually called as match winners come to field where there will be some runs on the board. Its comparatively easy when you bat when you got some runs on the board. Try to send Yuvraj/Pointing in opening, you will know what is the meaning of match winner.
Re: Re: sachin
by extreme on Oct 04, 2010 01:58 AM
Worthless person- it wa not easy to be there and make 98 runs. Yes it wkd have Been of some meaning if he had failed in last few series
Re: Re: sachin
by Ratikant Sahoo on Oct 04, 2010 09:39 AM
What is the meaning of match winner? Is it, when Australia make 300, Sachin must make 301st run? He comes to field when India score is 0 and he builds the innings. Unlike Yuvraj, Pointing, and others who usually called as match winners come to field where there will be some runs on the board. Its comparatively easy when you bat when you got some runs on the board. Try to send Yuvraj/Pointing in opening, you will know what is the meaning of match winner.
Re: sachin
by mahesh on Oct 03, 2010 10:03 PM
Yet some idiots in this country want Sachin to retire.I really do not understand whether the almighty has given them brains to think so negatively.Just imagine, had it not been for Sachin's 98, what would have been the state of the Indian team.God---bless the idiots with some commonsense.
Re: Re: sachin
by BRUNO MONTEIRO on Oct 03, 2010 10:50 PM | Hide message
You both are fools.. in fact this is the 1st time such thing has happend.. How many finals have sachin won for India.. Just 4 out of 40 plus finals.. that is a very poor average
Re: Re: Re: sachin
by anujit r on Oct 03, 2010 11:46 PM
dear friend... u mean to say that its not Indian XI but rather Sachin against the 11 players in the opposition...
Re: Re: Re: sachin
by bishadratna on Oct 04, 2010 12:21 AM
yaaa right dude..... but don't forget itz only sachin who took india 2 final in all 40 occasion... thats nt a poor avarage....100%
Re: Re: Re: sachin
by Ratikant Sahoo on Oct 04, 2010 09:48 AM
Do you know how many final matches India have won out of that 40? Perhaps not more than 10, I dont remember. And as per you Sachin only helped to win 4 matches for India. What about others? If you're trying to say Sachin is equal to rest 10 players then you're right he is not a match winner. And if he were not in team perhaps India could hv won only 1 out of 40.
