This sort of money can be paid only by those who have earned money through illegal means ,it is impossible for a sincere hard working individual to pay this money .So we now can summarise what is Cricket all about. - Industrialist not excluded ,corrupt officials not excluded ,Politicians any way do not pay for anything in their life.
This money suckers can raise the price of tickets to any extend bcus they know we r idiots n will still try to watch the game called KRiCAT in anyway..it's our responsibility an indian not to watch indian cricket n teach these suckers a lesson..the team parties after loosing a wolrd cup..wowww..they sud 1st eat stool of aussie players n drink their urine..rather than eating tandoori chicken n drining scotch like the sixer yuvi fatty..learn some prfessionalism from aussies n then play domestic cricket n b happy scoring 200 on indian pitches..bloody money suckers thrash of stick holders...
Re: Eat the stool of Aussie players...
by raju k on May 21, 2010 10:02 AM
ananya, i doubt whether you are a girl but if you are a girl then you and indian women cricketers should first eat the stool of aussie women players and drink their urine rather than barking here so that indian women team can be atleast 1% as good as aussie women team in looks and in professionalism and in talent. indian women can only ask for reservation. bloody losers.
Re: Eat the stool of Aussie players...
by menonsiddarth on May 21, 2010 09:22 AM
These BCCI guys still have not learnt from the carribeans crowd who did not turn up for matches coz of the steep ticket prices.
Excellent. All of us are now happy that we need not bother even thinking about buying tickets.we can as well enjoy sitting before TV with family & friends. These guys are money launderers who wants to kill the very spirit of the game & the game ultimately.I am wondering how come these people get such crazy ideas.people in india are not getting dollars or pounds for the salary.
Re: Re: Wow
by arun sharma on May 21, 2010 09:25 AM
The name "John Doe" is used as a placeholder name in a legal action, case or discussion for a male party, whose true identity is unknown or must be withheld for legal reasons. The name is also used to refer to a male corpse or hospital patient whose identity is unknown. This practice is widely used in the United States and Canada, but is rare in other English-speaking countries (including the United Kingdom itself, from where its use in a legal context originates – see Origin below).
