cricket is the very game of twists and turns and it is the game where even the luck is a player. And T20 is such a fast paced game wherein even a minnow can swallow a giant. In this scenario, it will be more enjoyable if it is just a one game final. (T)ricky should learn respecting other teams, hegemony will not suit in T20 matches
You accept the defeat first. Realize that you have lost final and world cup. If you are saying the final shall be best of three then each and every match shall be best of three.
The suggestion by RT is purely needless and will never workout because of the nature of the T20 games. It changes complexion within no time, there is no question of a single team being consistent in winning. The game has not evolved to that extent where players and teams can claim to have have cracked the winning formula. After 3 years, the spinners have just come to have some respect in this format. So it is still evolving. Even with regard to Aus and England, their players were involved only in a limited way in the recently concluded IPL and their success started coming in the later half only when the bowlers had started loosing steam and ideas. They were also relatively lot fresh compared with the Indians, Srilankans and Southafricans. India overplayed during this period and paid the price. So for the time being it is better to leave T20 the way it is and just enjoy the excitement associated with it without getting emotional about a particular team winning or loosing.
When you loose you remember of best of 3. What if other loose against you that time you dont advise best of 3. Australia is on decline. Accept the defeat.
