Discussion Board

''Australia were slow to react to T20''


Total 5 messages Pages | 1
Senthil
Australia were slow to react to T20
by Senthil on Jun 14, 2010 01:11 PM  | Hide replies

and they will always be like that only.

Gone are Aussie days. Now you are also just one of the team

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ajai Jacob
Re: Australia were slow to react to T20
by Ajai Jacob on Jun 14, 2010 03:12 PM
Always dreaming.Senthil lives in virtual reality.Not actual reality.aussies are the best.and they will always be no.1.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Against Pseudos
Re: Australia were slow to react to T20
by Against Pseudos on Jun 15, 2010 06:21 AM
Senthil:

You are right. Hayden is gone... :)

You spotted that very well and pretty quick, I must say... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anwarhatela
T20 IS ENTERTAINING BUT 50 OVERS BETTER
by anwarhatela on Jun 14, 2010 11:59 AM

T20 is market leader but 50 overs cricket is the best because it is has the qualities of both the test match and t20. moreover, a team has to struugle to win a 50 over game, it is not like t20 in which anyone can win the game. 50 over matches should always be promoted though their quantity can be reduced. Australia is undoubtedly the champion of 50 overs cricket as they have always produced quality players. India can be the world champs only if all the 11 players play like champs and not just 3-4 players. The way we r bowling over the years it seems that even bangladesh is a better bowling side than us. India could have out performed Australia by now but our bowlers have always let us down. look at Aussie bowling even the part timers like watson bowl quicker and generate more bounce than our regular bowlers. Shame on selectors !!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 5 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message