Re: difference
by sri on Jul 28, 2010 10:15 PM
have you heard of the one about Gandhi and lalgudi jayaraman? One is a violinist and the other a non-violenist
Re: Re: difference
by Raju on Jul 28, 2010 10:38 PM
You should say one deals with violins and the other with non violence. There is no such word as non violenist.
Re: Re: Re: difference
by sri on Jul 29, 2010 01:00 AM
Geez! We all know that. It's meant to be a pun. And by the way it's equally inaccurate to say that they "deal". They dont deal - one plays and the other uses or works with. These are all puns and so acceptable.
Re: Bedi & Muralidharan
by Ram Alegavi on Jul 28, 2010 09:57 PM
Don't agree with him. Tomorrow Murali will say Ganguly (ur bengali dada) was an ordinary batsman. what will u do then ?
Murali, You are a legal chucker. Bedi is atleast a bowler. But Murali is nothing more than a chucker. Bedi achieved 200 odd wickets at a time when no one had done it at that time. He is great at his time.
of cricket slamming each other. There is no need for this. Also, I don't believe that chucking and spinning are possible together. You can do only one at a time.
Re: Two greats
by Abuse Reporter on Jul 28, 2010 10:00 PM
Chucking helps in spinning the ball more. When you bend your arm you can get more spin than normal
Re: Re: Two greats
by Ramesh M on Jul 28, 2010 10:05 PM
but chucking cant get the type of spin murali does...the ball does follow a flight...yes Lasith malinga is one big chucker
Re: Re: Re: Two greats
by prasanth sreenivasan on Jul 28, 2010 10:34 PM
they say practice makes a man perfect..he practiced chucking and spinning the ball and became perfect in it.....ha ha ha
Re: bedi was lucky
by vivek on Jul 28, 2010 09:54 PM
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN PEOPLE LIKE BEDI CHANDRA PRASNNA bowling.have you ever heard the any names beyond sachin lara and inzimam .the fast bowlers in 60s and 70s were the greatest Lille Thomson holder garner Trueman body line bowlers were the greatest .and the batsmen encountered them without any protectives and physicians ,trainers .the players of 80s and 90s are not the grates they only commercial commodities for the control boards
Re: bedi was lucky
by s sethi on Jul 28, 2010 09:43 PM
murali was lucky enough that he didnt have to use a straight arm to bowl to these batsmen. Shane warne can tell better.
Re: bedi was lucky
by secret on Jul 28, 2010 09:50 PM
Utter bogus. He had to bowl to Fredricks, Greenidge, Kallicharan, Viv Richards the GREAT, Clive Lloyd. Aussies also had Chappel brothers.
Re: bedi was lucky
by Ramandeep Judge on Jul 28, 2010 09:45 PM
Do u think, Chappell brothers, Richards, Lloyds, Kahnai, Zaheer Abbas, Majid Khan etc were gully cricketers???? Personally I dont agree with what Bedi is saying but as a bowler he was great
