Re: australians & ponting will be worried
by Manu Zach on Jan 18, 2010 12:06 PM
Sachin's family would be more worried, because if he goes on playing, one day he might collapse and die on the pitch. Poor old chap is struggling to breath.
Re: australians & ponting will be worried
by Junior Don on Jan 18, 2010 12:06 PM
Yes the difference is of 20 centuries but they need not worry as Mickey ponting can never ever come close to it.
wow what run against the best bowling attack in the world (aif, umer gul kaneri etc), mindblowing double century 89 wow , what a brave captain sachin can be declaring against the best side. what a fielder. man this guy is the best.That poing is no good , they can only bribe countries like bangla and make centuries for himself
Re: sachin the great
by Manoj Pagar on Jan 18, 2010 11:47 AM
see this idiot, always these ppls cries that sachin never plays in cretical situation(i.e. whenever there is need to have good runs) if u see score cards u wil come to know that it was realy critical situation this time and he played very well and still not out he may have lead india at some good score,if he would have get some support from other end.
wow what run against the best bowling attack in the world (aif, umer gul kaneri etc), mindblowing double century 89 wow , what a brave captain sachin can be declaring against the best side. what a fielder. man this guy is the best.That poing is no good , they can only bribe countries like bangla and make centuries for himself
Re: Century
by Unfriendly on Jan 18, 2010 11:33 AM
I think you are posting the comments just for the heck of it. Yes, he has completed a century over Bangladesh because he is in the team. If he has not scored a century then India would have been all out for around 150 against Bangladesh. Also, if he does not score a century, you will be the first one to say that Sachin cannot score against lowly Bangladesh. What do you want him to do when he is in the team? Now you will say that he should retire. Why should he retire when you say? Will you quit your job, if I tell you to leave the company? Its his job to play. He earns his money by playing just as you are earning by working.
I have got a suggestion for you. Why don't you join Sachin Tendulkar as his mentor & manager? You can then tell him what to do.
Re: Re: Century
by ravi prakash on Jan 18, 2010 11:42 AM
Very Well SAid dear now this fellow wont ever say any thing about such great player welllllllll done Sachin
Re: Century
by naveen dhanerwal on Jan 18, 2010 11:29 AM
Yup! We are proud because he managed to put a respectable total else India would have out for 150! He made 105 out of last 164 runs. Mind it!
Bangladesh is really an ordinary side. India scored 243 only because of their own foolishness, definitely not because of Bangladesh's bowling which was pretty pedestrian. As far as Sehwag is concerned, he has shown scant respect for Bangla bowlers. His 50 off 45 deliveries justifies this. If other batsmen got "scared" of Bangla bowlers, what can Sehwag do? He cannot bat for each batsmen. Sachin too has shown that the devil is in the mind of the batsmen & not in the pitch. Its confirmed that Bangladesh is an ordinary side, was an ordinary side & will remain an ordinary side. No need to raise eyebrows over Viru's comment which is absolutely spot on.
Re: Sehwag is absolutely correct....
by sanjay sharma on Jan 18, 2010 11:29 AM
I do Agree with you, Sehwag is write, its only our batsmen who failed in first inning
Re: Re: Sehwag is absolutely correct....
by naveen dhanerwal on Jan 18, 2010 11:33 AM
Whatever mate but you have to show some respect to opponents. It won't take anything from you. Whatever happen in next 3 days is another story but right now Bangladesh have put Sehwag in to a deep trouble! Sehwag even put Sri Lanka in it saying that even Sri Lanka can't take 20 wickets of India in a test match! That's too much to say!
Re: Sehwag is absolutely correct....
by Nitesh Kumar on Jan 18, 2010 11:36 AM
Well our side got All out for 243 against ordinary side (for whatever reason, end of the day out an out), its time for sehwag to shut up and to put some more runs on board.
Re: Sehwag is not wrong!
by venkatesh naidu on Jan 18, 2010 11:23 AM
I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH U. NOW EVEN WITH BATTING AS WELL AS BOWLING IS PRETTY SHIT WITH USELESS BOWLWERS LIKE ZAHEER KHAN, WHO DOESNT KNOW THE MEANING OF LINE & LENGHT..EVERY TOM, DICK & HARRY GOES AFTER HIM......
Why he was giving chance TAIL lenders to play.HE was quick in completing his century and than sreenath to face the trboule so he can go back NOT OUT to improve his ave.He is GREAT with his records but not GREAT for India
Re: sachin plays for himself
by Against Pseudos on Jan 19, 2010 06:29 AM
emaares:
True. Also, he should have protected the middle order first, which wouldn't have brought the tail out in the first place.
Whereas the middle order and Gambhir played for the country and not for themselves. :)
We need more such performances from Gambhir and the middle order instead of personal play by Sachin, and we will surely become a Permanent #1 test side for all time to come. :)
Re: sachin plays for himself
by naveen dhanerwal on Jan 18, 2010 11:27 AM
It was a wide yorker on the last ball by hussain to keep Sachin off the strike in the nest over! he's not a fool like you. He does know very well what to do.
Re: sachin plays for himself
by Ganesh Ganesh on Jan 18, 2010 11:23 AM
If sachin got out for duck means india will all out for 138. It was a brilliant innings from sachin helped india to post a respectable score.
Re: Re: sachin plays for himself
by emaares on Jan 18, 2010 11:33 AM
You all are emotional.Indian cricketers fall to two gropu type one GAVASKAR like and another KAPIL dev like use your wisdom and you will see the diffrence.I was talking GRATNESS of sachin...a great plaler will always have shot to be on strike...specially agaisnt bangladesh.I love sachin for his determination to make RECORDS...he will mkae more..
Re: Re: Re: sachin plays for himself
by Against Pseudos on Jan 19, 2010 06:31 AM
emaares:
So if a player gets out he is NOT great? :)
If a player does not ensure that the team never gets all out then he is not great? :)
Good that I learnt something exceptionally well today from you. But if that is your definition of Great, then no Sachin is not great. And no one ever has been great including Sir Donald Bradman, and no we don't care about your definition of greateness either. :)
