Re: Re: Re: Re: Hey shevag sachin retiring
by vetrichelvan on Feb 21, 2010 08:36 PM
Dont try to maintain your wrong opinion. People know well about Sachin and Shewag and Persons like you.So..You need detailed lessons. Shewag tell about his mind only and not try to say anything against Sachin. He also be the pillar of Indian team now.
Re: Hey shevag sachin retiring
by cs india on Feb 21, 2010 11:46 PM
This is what Sachin is waiting for. Yes, Sachin wants all the youungesters to retire and he continue in the team. SELFISH FELLOW.....
In 2-3 years there will be a place available in the middle order by the exit of Dravid/Laxman/Sachin. But who take the his position? I can't see an opener in the juniors' list to be an partner for Gambhir.
The Board can give him a chance when the middle order opens up in future and see how he performs.Moreover, whether there would be a suitable partnet for Gambhir up the order would also play a role as the selectors maynot be willing to fiddle with an established and well performing opening pair.
Re: Maybe
by Pea Ace on Feb 22, 2010 05:05 PM
Cheteswar Pujara can definitely be tried as an opener in the near future, if Sehwag moves down the order. That he is taalented, there is no doubt. He only has to find an opening and then prove himself.
Re: Re: Maybe
by Pea Ace on Feb 22, 2010 05:09 PM
And also Virat Kohli, and Manish Pandey(Karnataka). India is full of talent waiting to burst onto the scene !!!
Though Sehwag himself wants to play in middle order but his fans wants him to always play at opening and destroy the opponent bowler's mindset, because when he came with his opening partner Sachin Tendulkar then opponents can't guess what will be the target India is going to give them.
He has scored 674 runs in seven test innings at a whopping average of 84.25 with five centuries and one score of above fifty. Talk about consistency and getting better like a bottle of vintage wine! He has scored centuries in four back-to-back test matches with games against Sri Lanka at Kanpur and Mumbai being the only two exceptions.
If one were to extend the review period back to the entire 2009 series, Tendulkar continues to shine through. He played ten matches starting with the series in New Zealand till the Eden Gardens triumph, and it was only in one match (the third test at Wellington) that Tendulkar failed to make a crucial contribution.
His average was a robust 78.3 in the ten tests with six centuries, three over-fifty scores and a highest of 160 against the Kiwis at Hamilton. Just proves that great players are beyond statistics and to some extent beyond even wins and losses.
It is just that his detractors seem to remember all Sachin\\\'s failures and hound him with data. But, when he makes significant contributions they prefer to keep mum. One doesn\\\'t blame them for their uncharitable ways.
Re: Sachin Tendulker
by om shanti on Feb 21, 2010 10:48 AM
Yeah you are right and Amla scored 490 in 2 test matches with an average of 490 with 2 centuries and 1 double century..a rare feet !
He has scored 674 runs in seven test innings at a whopping average of 84.25 with five centuries and one score of above fifty. Talk about consistency and getting better like a bottle of vintage wine! He has scored centuries in four back-to-back test matches with games against Sri Lanka at Kanpur and Mumbai being the only two exceptions.
If one were to extend the review period back to the entire 2009 series, Tendulkar continues to shine through. He played ten matches starting with the series in New Zealand till the Eden Gardens triumph, and it was only in one match (the third test at Wellington) that Tendulkar failed to make a crucial contribution.
His average was a robust 78.3 in the ten tests with six centuries, three over-fifty scores and a highest of 160 against the Kiwis at Hamilton. Just proves that great players are beyond statistics and to some extent beyond even wins and losses.
It is just that his detractors seem to remember all Sachin's failures and hound him with data. But, when he makes significant contributions they prefer to keep mum. One doesn't blame them for their uncharitable ways.
