Ranjit now has acted firmly as it is match between two white skin cricket playing country, Had been India , Pakistan or West Ind,he would have become weak knee Seen his earlier decisions when India toured Austrelia.
Re: Can you imagine the penalty if Ganguly had done this.....?
by vinay on Dec 28, 2010 02:44 AM
100% agreed. saurav was the pet pl ayer for biased icc referees.
Re: Can you imagine the penalty if Ganguly had done this.....?
by Rajan S on Dec 28, 2010 01:09 AM
Yes the foreign media especially the aussies would be gunning for the saurav's blood, if he had done this. They are arrogant idiots really. Though everyone say that bcci is using their might, but aussies always gets away for any misbehaviour on the field. The aussies always comes up with such idiotic acts, when they are down in the game. Remember micheal slater claiming dravid's catch during his partnership with vvs laxman when he scored that memorable 281. The tv replays showed very clearly that the ball touched the ground. But slater was seen saying that he caught the ball. So its always been double standards in the game when whites are playing, especially the aussies.
Re: Re: Can you imagine the penalty if Ganguly had done this.....
by Ravi Iyer on Dec 28, 2010 08:45 AM
Yes, agree with you. Slater's claim of dravid's catch was not in the famous Kolkata test but in the first test in Mumbai.
Re: PONTING IS BETTER THAN SACHIN
by Dabbang on Dec 27, 2010 11:36 PM
I would say both r same.when the Team needs them most..they disappoint..like for today's match vs SA..Sach the God was out quickly..he will keep his wicket intact only 4 making his records..
Re: PONTING IS BETTER THAN SACHIN
by C M on Dec 28, 2010 12:42 AM
Yeah Sure when it comes to How not to be sportsy,...Ricky is a good cricket player with all Bad bad manners...He is comparable to boxer Mike tyson ...
Aussies are just a bunch of clueless idiots who doesn't know what to do after such a disaster in their 1st innings. Ponting needs to step down immediately...
Dar impressed me a lot when he referred Prior's dismissal ...The question is why didn't he straightaway gave a no-ball..what would have happened if the ball was hit to a boundary instead of caught ? Would he still have referred it ? Neverthless , it was a good one as most umpires would have kept quite as they were supposed to have given no-ball at the time of delivery being bowled.
Re: Great
by Chaitanya NS on Dec 27, 2010 09:02 PM
I heard commentators telling ICC has a new rule/guideline for umpires to refer for No-ball when someone is out & they are not sure abt overstepping. If batsman not-out on a delivery where umpire is not sure, benefit of doubt in favour of bowler.
