Re: Re: Re: TRAITOR SACHIN
by Against Pseudos on Dec 22, 2010 11:53 AM
Aries Squared:
I admire you on so fairly and squarely criticizing Laxman at Mohali... maybe you can write a letter to ICC to reverse the decision and award that test match to Australia... According to your brilliant logic India should have lost that test match.... no? :)
Re: TRAITOR SACHIN
by Against Pseudos on Dec 22, 2010 11:51 AM
Aries Squared:
Well said.... on that grounds, let's drop Laxman too, for his performance in the Mohali test which we unfortunately won putting to rest your "intelligent" logic... ;-)
Sachin's so called " Godly Feat" will be Tested at Laureus World Sports Award. It is the Highest Award sportsman can get. Even Nomination is also Great Achievement .. Let us see whether he gets at least Nomination. Press man and Media persons from 150 COUNTRIES will select Nomination . We will come to know within 10/15 Days where DOES Sachin and Cricket actually Stand ?? Does Cricket and Sachin's " Towering Feat" has ANY TAKERS in 150 Countries and on global scale. So please Don't talk of Olympic Or ..Cricket has an appeal NOT Byyond Common Wealth nations .....
Re: wait mr Gavaskar..........
by shakil on Dec 21, 2010 01:15 PM
It is Good and surprising that Gavaskar Knows about Olympic. Normally Cricketer and it's Fan does not know much about Olympic. Cricket has their own God and not concerned about what is happening in other sporting events. All records at initial stage is always considered unthinkable like Richard Hadlee's 430 wickets 20 years Back... now we have 800 !!
Re: Bradman was incomparable!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Manish Tewari on Dec 21, 2010 01:35 PM
U R TALKING AS IF 10DULKAR HAS DONE NOTHING FOR INDIAN CRICKET, AND MOREOVER HE HAS PLAYED FOR OWN SELF. FRIEND HE HAS GIVEN MANY VICTORIES TO INDIA. CHEERS
Re: Re: Bradman was incomparable!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by India on Dec 21, 2010 01:48 PM
Bro. Manish
I do recognise Sachins contribution but he defintely has not achieved many victories specially in many finals & when Indias chips are down...I congratulated him when he complete his 50th Ton...
Sachin has gone thru a lot of trials & tribulation... by India (View MyPage) on Dec 20, 2010 01:08 PM
before achieving this superlative feat with his
sheer grit,courage & determination.
A great fighting and courageous hero of mother
India.After completing 50th century,he looked
upward to dedicate his century to his
father..Peace for departed soul
A role model for todays youth to show how to respect your parents...
Re: Re: Re: Bradman was incomparable!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Kamlesh Bhanushali on Dec 21, 2010 01:52 PM
One can easily compare stats like you did. every second match was a century for brad man. had he played more tests then is a question. Friend one needs to be ultra fit to play for 20 years which bradman was not and that is why Scahin is teh best.
Re: Bradman was incomparable!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Sameer on Dec 21, 2010 02:23 PM
Boy you are wrong on so many accounts. First you say not to higlight individual record and then go about comparing tendy to Bradman
Next you tell that tendy's scores didnt' account for wins. I find it amusing that people who don't even qualify for their gulli cricket team are commenting on performance of Sachin.
It is absolutely non-sense to even try to make a stat of how many centuries accounted for win. Because century is a century. The player did his part, his team members were supposed to do their part.
Sachins century breakdown Wins : 20 Draw : 19 Loss : 11
Do the math yourself.
Did it ever occur to you that indians are celebrating the only positive in an otherwise hopeless test match. The stupid bowlers should have been crucified, but instead people are crucifying the only player who did his part.
Friggin amazing. I always said, this pathetic country doesn't deserve someone like tendy. If tendy was white you fools would have worshipped him like Bradman, BECAUSE YOU SLAVES STILL CONSIDER " if its white, it is right"
Re: Re: Bradman was incomparable!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by India on Dec 21, 2010 09:01 PM
Sachin has always played for his
record more than team victory.
between 2000 and 2008 India reached 10 finals of triseries and could win 2 only & most of finals Sachin failed in crunch situation.....U Moron Sameer go and die in some gutter or slum
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.
Last 2 years, Australia thumped South Africa and England secured a draw.
We lost by an innings this year and yet the papers of full of Sachin rubbish. Wake up!! There is a small matter of world #1 ranking that we need to stand up to. Drop Sachin to avoid all this distraction. Sachin's 100s are only a burden and distraction to team India. He is bad luck for the nation.
Re: South Africa are winning first match at home after 3 years
by Arun Kurup on Dec 21, 2010 12:09 PM
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.
Re: South Africa are winning first match at home after 3 years
by Sameer on Dec 21, 2010 02:31 PM
Jaya
Did it ever occur to you that indians are celebrating the only positive in an otherwise hopeless test match. The stupid bowlers should have been crucified, but instead people are crucifying the only player who did his part.
Friggin amazing. I always said, this pathetic country doesn't deserve someone like tendy. If tendy was white you fools would have worshipped him like Bradman, BECAUSE YOU SLAVES STILL CONSIDER " if its white, it is right"
Re: South Africa are winning first match at home after 3 years
by Lara on Dec 21, 2010 01:19 PM
A son told somebody about his 80 years old father that what is the role of his father in his life?
Smith and South Africans must be laughing looking at how foolish we are talking about Sachin all the time after a thumping innings defeat. In a team sport, Sachin's contribution is minimal to the team.
Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Rajesh Verma on Dec 21, 2010 11:56 AM
Stop writing nonsense things on this platform. You idiot don't know about the cricket and you only feel happy criticizing Sachin all the time. Well done master Sachin
Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Against Pseudos on Dec 22, 2010 11:59 AM
Jaya S:
Since you so rightly pointed out that this is a team sport, Smith and South Africans must surely be laughing at the 10 other Indians in the 'team'... ;-)
Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Sameer on Dec 21, 2010 02:26 PM
JAYA
If you are sick of hearing,why the F are you here ? there are plenty of topics where you can blog right ?
I arrive at 2 conclusions
1) you are paid by rediff to increase site hit ratio 2) No one pays attention to you in real life and your life is so pathetic that you are here to grab attention that you lack in real life by hook or crook
Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Arun Kurup on Dec 21, 2010 11:48 AM
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.
Re: Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by muthalagu valan on Dec 21, 2010 12:03 PM
That s simply ridiculus how sachin batted on monday morning... he should have atleast tried to cover the innings defeat. I respect sachin... and i was overwhelmed de way he played a day before. But on monday morning where we are jus 30 rund to overcome an innings defeat is much important than giving strike to tail enders on the first ball...
Re: Re: Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Jaya S on Dec 21, 2010 12:06 PM
Muthalagu, now you know Sachin's real intentions. Join the gang. He was never a player for the country. Neither did he try to score fast or farm the strike as he was scared he will get out and his average in SouthAfrica may not cross 50. His main goal is to have over 50 average in all countries so we can call him greatest.
Re: Re: Re: Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by rokothonuo on Jan 07, 2011 09:46 PM
yes very good point jaya...wat sachin did that morning was ridiculous.cos if u look back at how kallis sheltered the south african tail enders by taking 80% of the strike,,,the manner in which sachin approached his game that morning showed him in poor light notwithstanding his many great achievements and commitment to the team...that one ridiculous morning will remain a blot forever on his south african tours atleast
Re: Re: Re: Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by muthalagu valan on Dec 21, 2010 12:20 PM
i agree, i was n total shock when he was out of stike in the first ball and udkant s batting...
Re: Re: Re: Re: I am sick of hearing about Sachin
by Against Pseudos on Dec 22, 2010 12:01 PM
Jaya S:
Well said.... we should immediately write to ICC to reverse the Mohali decision and award the test match to Australia, becoz Laxman wasn't playing for the country... he was scared he will get out and his average against the Aussies will go down... his main goal was to have over 50 average against all teams (particularly Australia) and hence ICC should take note of his unsporting character and should declare India as losers at Mohali.... right? ;-)
It must have been about 10 years back that Sunil Gavaskar, when asked to comment about the batting of Tendulkar came out with this astonishing prophesy : He said that Sachin would score 50 Test centuries and that "HE was God's gift to Indian cricket." It was an astonishing thing to say then - and today I am reminded about this statement of Gavaskar. While saluting the Little Master let me through these columns also salute the original "Little Master Sunil Gavaskar who was wise enough to see the great abilities of Tendulkar. Hats off to both of you SIRS.
Re: Re: GAVASKAR - AND TENDULKAR
by Arun Kurup on Dec 21, 2010 12:12 PM
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.
Re: GAVASKAR - AND TENDULKAR
by sangeetha murali on Dec 21, 2010 04:00 PM
It would have been nice if Gavaskar had only said that Sachin will win 60% to 80% of the matches, instead of saying 50 test centuries... It would have been useful.
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.
To win a cricket match, you need contribution. Sachin has contributed to his team. Only few others did. When you speak about Adam Gilchrist or even Ponting, how many other players contributed in those particular match. Do you have any idea? Can you say that only because of his (Gilchrist) contribution, his team won and others didn't contribute much?
So, people just ignore personal contribution not realizing the true spirit of that person. First you recognize him. Then you criticize. If you do not do this, then you have to think what you did for your country before comparing others.