Discussion Board

Sehwag is most destructive batsman now: Richards


Total 130 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
prasheen mothukuri
Hail Sehwag
by prasheen mothukuri on Dec 10, 2010 06:26 AM  | Hide replies

Viv conveyed aptly, Sehwag is the most destructive player considering his statistics which talks consistent fast big hundreds like Bradman. 2 fast triple, 15 fast 150 hundreds. Never gets bowled,lbw'ed,caught behind ,slip catch frequently. Thats the hallmark of true batsmanship, solid defence, stand and deliver, hitting the same length ball in multiple directions. All about Sehwag is bradmanisque. Hail Sehwag as no in the past20 yrs have the records like him. Hailllll Sehwag. I heard people talk about Sachin wicket as prized wicket. Thats bullshit, Sehwag wicket is the prized wicket.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
benny paul
Re: Hail Sehwag
by benny paul on Dec 10, 2010 09:52 AM
them u mean only sewag should represet the indian team :) ..funy goose ...there s no comparassion to sachin , his dedication & his records ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Kaka
Re: Re: Hail Sehwag
by Kaka on Dec 10, 2010 08:44 PM
Viru is modern day's King Richards...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
franklin b
Better than Sehwag
by franklin b on Dec 10, 2010 03:40 AM  | Hide replies

Pollard the Best

    Forward  |  Report abuse
jagdish chand
Re: Better than Sehwag
by jagdish chand on Dec 10, 2010 09:43 AM
But he is not that consistant

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raja Ram
Re: Better than Sehwag
by Raja Ram on Dec 10, 2010 09:48 AM
Boss! Pollard is yet to make his debut in Test arena. To talk of someone who is yet to taste the real cricket against someone who is been the destructive batsman - read opener for almost a decade is immature.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
makdi man
Re: Re: Better than Sehwag
by makdi man on Dec 10, 2010 10:52 AM
Yes i agree with you completely. Sehwag is way ahead of Pollard as he has not proved it in Test or internatinal cricket.
You can compare Yusuf Pathan and Kieron Pollard.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAJU subramani
imran
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:26 PM  | Hide replies

Imran is a foool... haq was a very poor runner...he cannot bowl..except one or two innnigs HAQ scores was not timely..u judge a cricketer based on overall performance

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramandeep Judge
Re: imran
by Ramandeep Judge on Dec 09, 2010 11:28 PM
Pl read carefully before passing ur judgement. He said most gifted player of fast bowling

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAJU subramani
Re: Re: imran
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:52 PM
It is LARA not HAQ...these pakis judge the players on relgion basis..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAJU subramani
Re: Re: Re: imran
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:55 PM
Infact the contemporory GREENIDGE was more destructibe than HAQ

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Varun
Re: Re: imran
by Varun on Dec 10, 2010 09:56 AM
The same imran said haq cannot play the moving ball hence he wasnt sent up the order.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sheetal mishra
Re: Re: imran
by sheetal mishra on Dec 09, 2010 11:37 PM
haq was a team player to win the world cup, simply playing for nothing is not justified.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RAJU subramani
Re: Re: Re: imran
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:53 PM
we won world cup becaue of a team men called AMRANATH and KAPIL.. that does not male them the most destructive batsmen..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Apurv
Re: Re: imran
by Apurv on Dec 09, 2010 11:37 PM
@ ramandeep: what r u doing in this indian site u f**kng paki jerk??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: imran
by Against Pseudos on Dec 10, 2010 05:09 AM
Apurv:

I didn't know that having the ability of "not reading properly" was a pre-requisite to be on this site... ;-)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
bixin
Sehwag is most destructive in modern cricket: Richards
by bixin on Dec 09, 2010 11:19 PM  | Hide replies

Aanshuman Gaikawad was use to be most destructive in : Its me

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ramandeep Judge
Re: Sehwag is most destructive in modern cricket: Richards
by Ramandeep Judge on Dec 09, 2010 11:29 PM
No Chris Tavare. Once he played a whole session and scored 2 runs..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
alex
Not Sachin
by alex on Dec 09, 2010 11:16 PM  | Hide replies

Sachin not the most destructive?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAJU subramani
Re: Not Sachin
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:22 PM
sachind is destructive...sewag is the most destructive in the last 10 years..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Punter
most destructive but most unreliable
by Punter on Dec 09, 2010 11:15 PM  | Hide replies

sehwag might be the most explosive opener, but he is also the most unreliable one.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RAJU subramani
Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by RAJU subramani on Dec 09, 2010 11:21 PM
he is one of the most reliable...otherwise he would not scored so many triple and double centuries...only reliable players can score like that...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Punter
Re: Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by Punter on Dec 09, 2010 11:30 PM
raju: visit rediff forums after the tour of SA and we can see how much Sehwag has scored overall.
I know if he stays around, he can be dangerous but there is a big IF.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by Against Pseudos on Dec 10, 2010 05:11 AM
Raju Subramani:

Despite scoring "so many" triple and double centuries if one's average is still in the 40's ...then that itself shows a lack of reliability...
Baaki,sab,theek,hai

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Venkatesh Sankaran
Re: Re: Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by Venkatesh Sankaran on Dec 10, 2010 08:50 AM
well avg is not 40 it is more than 50 in test matches

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: Re: Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by Against Pseudos on Dec 10, 2010 10:37 AM
Venkatesh Sankaran:

Thanx for making my point for me... ;-)

With "so many" triple centuries and double centuries, the average is still less than 60... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
makdi man
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by makdi man on Dec 10, 2010 10:48 AM
Sorry to say but all you guys are moving away from the point.
It is about the most destructive batsman not about the most consistent batsman.
And Yes Sehwag is the most consistent among the destructive batsman in the current era in Test cricket.

Forward   |   Report abuse
bixin
Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by bixin on Dec 09, 2010 11:20 PM
Punter sehwag is the most explosive opener, but he is also the most reliable one. Dont take name of Sachin

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sameer Bhagwat
Re: most destructive but most unreliable
by Sameer Bhagwat on Dec 09, 2010 11:18 PM
Thats a oxymoron, you can't be desructive and reliable. He averages more than Richards, is close to maing more centuries than him. Also has more double nd triple centuries than Richards.

So reliability is not the right word for a desructive batsman.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Kaka
Re: @kaka
by Kaka on Dec 09, 2010 11:18 PM
BacchaToAapHi aurKacchaBiAapHi! UlluKePatteLagteHo!

U are from which country?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 130 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4   Older >
Write a message