They used the retaining options best compared to all other teams. They have almost filled thier batsman now. They need one Foreign batsman and a good Indina allrounder to look for the auction. For which, they don't need to put more money and can spend enough amount for bowling attack. Wise people from Chennai..
Re: Gangully and Kumble should have retained
by B M on Dec 09, 2010 06:55 AM
Ganguly will find no bidders and Bengalis will blow their top thinking this is an INSULT to Bengal!
Re: Gangully and Kumble should have retained
by ronald raha on Dec 09, 2010 12:18 AM
Dude check the SR.. 117.. ha ha.. people score n IPL at an SR excessive of 150..Poor dada shud retire now..
Re: Re: Gangully and Kumble should have retained
by yogesh on Dec 09, 2010 12:34 AM
How much Str rate u think the player is gong to have who got a pathetic team, who used to lose 3 wickets on an average in the initial 5 over. Dada win more matches single handedly as compare to Gayle, who has not won a single match and has been retained.
Re: Re: Re: Gangully and Kumble should have retained
by sujay on Dec 09, 2010 07:21 AM
Well said buddy....This is game played by Sharukh, Ganguly will be there in Kolkata team-not because Sharukh will not able to enter Kolkata if he drops Ganguly but Ganguly has really played well, he plays anchor role , and Kolkata love him(I know even entire Country love him-who will forget his opening partnership will one of the great(sachin),only few can compete with Sachin, who can forget Ganguly's towering Sixes). Sharukh had played a game when IPL-2 was moved to South Africa, he instantly made Macullum the captain, and next IPL when it happened in India(Kolkata), he understood this cunningness will not work, again Ganguly was made captain. Understand one thing Ganguly Plays the game with Heart-dil se khelta hai.
Re: Should retire...
by principal stantonysHSSPudukad on Dec 08, 2010 11:47 PM
common there is no place for such comments in IPL ..they will get picked if they are worth picking ...its not indian team to be selected on the basis of perceptions
Re: Should have retained
by shlok on Dec 09, 2010 02:32 AM
Paisa Kaka barega...each retained player means 1.3m less in cap..why would one pay 1.3m for these players..
Re: Should have retained
by bharatpremi on Dec 10, 2010 02:54 PM
RCB-Kohli,Uthappa RR-Warne,Watson,Yusuf DD-Veeru,Nannes MI-Malinga,Harbhajan,Polard,Tiwary KKR-Gayle CSK-Dhoni ,Ashwin,Vijay,Morkel KXIp-Mahela DC-Symonds,T.Suman
According to me, going by the rule that 2 international players and two local players could be retained, the following players should have been retained. Fell free to say what u feel..:)
Re: My Thinking
by Raju on Dec 08, 2010 11:03 PM
Gilchrist Symonds Hayden havent been playing cricket for a while and their form is suspect. No point in retaining them which would cost the franchise about 1.8 million dollars which they could spend on other current players.
Re: My Thinking
by NIKHIL VALENTINEMATHEWS on Dec 09, 2010 12:42 AM
The old guys should call it a day. Veterans like Kumble, Dravid, Ganguly, Hayden, Warne, Gilchrist, Symonds provided they have performed recently. Its a exciting game. Also a new generation game. These guys can coach the side better in my opinion.
Re: Re: My Thinking
by candy bhatia on Dec 09, 2010 01:50 AM
@nikhil..dude m not sure about warne and ganguly.. but kumble was the best bowler last season..nd kallis one of the best batsman..
Re: Re: Re: Hope SRK becomes bankrupt
by Maihoon Don on Dec 08, 2010 11:44 PM
you are brain less. KKR despite its bad run was the most profitable team in IPL.
