Don,t act like small cry baby, Dramabaji bandh kar, look like a begger, i want to tell all those sehwag supporter not to use the sentence any more- sehwag play for country and not for self record - see the proof - if u can u
Re: stupid sehwag stop this non sense
by shaheen khan on Aug 19, 2010 03:55 PM
you must be out of your mind to call him a cry baby and beggar. what he did any self respecting person would do.
Ha ha ha ha , Now Why all are u guys Supported Shrinath when he bowled lots of wides whe kumble was on 10 wicket track.. This is sports guys ..And everything should acceptable thts why Maradonas goal by Hand called golden goal .
A delibrate mistake which is non-sporting shall be punished. If a fielder throws a bowl to boundry on the last bowl of an over to bring tailender on the strike, umpires penalised fielding team for 5 runs.If such intentional mistakes have been allowed then Murali would not have completed his 800 wickets as players would have thrown their wicket to other bowlers or as run out. Wasim would have ran himself out to prevent Kumble getting his perfect Ten. Srilanka has history of it as they have denied ganguly and sachin in past.Good that sehwag declared it to whole world.
Re: Awful but lawful
by parmeshwar ps on Aug 18, 2010 10:53 AM
Best Indian Team,for World Cup. Dravid should be in the Indian team,since Middle order is not cappable of handling the Innings till the end.His Experience would be handy ,so that in the end Raina/Yuvi/Dhoni would take till the end
No doubt this was poor display of sportsmanship by Sri Lankans but if this was Sachin instead of Sehwag, Sachins criticizers would have criticized Sachin with their regular comments against him of playing for 100's and records.
i am wondering that why wasn't the runs scored off the sixer hit by sehwag counted? if it was then sehwag’s score would have read 105 not out. the argument given on all websites is that since the winning run was achieved by the virtue of no-ball bowled, the match had thus effectively ended. my question is that suppose if sehwag in the course of that shot for a six, had dislodged his bails with the foot or whatever, wouldn't he be given out hitwicket, even though it was a no-ball? According to the rules, batsman can be given out off a no-ball if he dislodges his bails by any part of his body or bat while playing the ball or the bails are dislodged by a fielder, bowler or the wicketkeeper and the batsman is found short off the crease.
if he would have been given out, then how was the ball dead? if his wicket can be claimed to have fallen because of hitwicket even though the no-ball would have credited india with the required one run to win and ended the match there and then; then why he cannot be credited with six more runs even though the no-ball had credited india with the required one run to win and thus had ‘effectively ended the match’ ?
INDIA supported MURALI to gain 800th wicket in his last International test match. But SANGAKKARA and SURAJ RANDIV played dirty politics against INDIA's hero SEHWAG..This shows how jellous and selfish SANGAKKARA is ! He is spoiling SRILANKA's name which was lifted by great cricketers like SANATH JAYASURIYA and ARJUNA RANATUNGA
I remember a test match between India and Sri Lanka. Ravi Ratnayaka was the Bowler and Azhar was batting. Ravi Ratnayake ran into bowl, stopped at the crease, returned to his bowling mark, Ran into bowl again, stopped and returned. Ran in again and bowled at Azhar, who got out LBW on 199.
it does not depends on whole team ,it depends on individual .clearly it was sanga decision as he told something to randiv we can did the same while murali waitiing for his 800 .our players could get out by other way remeber an incident when kumble had taken 9 wickest against pakistan ,srinath bowling wide bowls waqar younis asked wasim akram to get run out but akram refused .he said if he can do let him so this way pakistani player played fare game
