Re: Re: Re: Re: S.Raina
by Anurag Rathore on Apr 23, 2010 02:55 PM
At international level temperament matters most rather than skill. Dhoni is biggest example of it.
1. No team is perfect, else any team would have won all matches, why CSK won only half? 2. This point is a joke, Fernando, Pollard, Malinga, Bhajji and Zaheer are strike bowlers not econimical. 3. same as first point.
Re: @ AR
by Anurag Rathore on Apr 23, 2010 02:47 PM
You are asking why CSK won only half. Can you tell me why MI couldn't reach in semi of last 2 IPL's. As I am saying toss makes a huge difference in MI performance. This year they get chance to bat first and performed well. But if you will see all 3 editions, MI is not a good chaser.
1.MI is not good chaser. You can see they have lost many close matches while chasing. 2.MI bowlers are economical but never looks wicket taker and can't save low total. 3.Middle order is very weak and has panic few times in this tournament. So much dependency on Sachin.
Re: Re: Anurag
by sharp shooter on Apr 23, 2010 02:38 PM
you are thinking like this because CSK winning and it is non-indian player case, if it would have been Dhoni or any indian player instead of Hayden you would not have been so charitable. am i correct?
Re: Re: Anurag
by Senthil on Apr 23, 2010 02:40 PM
I don't agree. MCC is approved that Bat. If bowlers right to use Google then Batsman right to use Mongoose.
Re: Anurag
by sharp shooter on Apr 23, 2010 02:37 PM
another problem is he is good catcher but otherwise can not contribute even a single bit with ball, like someone like jayasuriya or pollard can do.
