Re: Why SRK hired Akram
by Jay on Apr 17, 2010 08:22 AM
He is a professional and just like others he can also be hired. Before criticizing Akram, one should check with the KKR bowlers whether his inputs were of use or not. In the past he had helped a few Indian bowlers and they have acknowledged the same.
1] WHAT DOES WASIM SAY , BALL TEMPERING ? 2] LOOKS HE HAS FORGOTTEN THE ART & SCIENCE OF BALLS BEING TEMPERED 3] HE NEEDS SOME COACHING FROM THE PEOPLE HE SUSPECTS OF DOING SO
KKR bowlers failed to learn ball tampering, otherwise they could have been in the finals. Ishant Sharma needs to know the art of ball tampering and he can see the results quickly. Good point Mr. Akram-- do not teach bad things to our good boys--this can only happen in Pakistan. You better write a coaching manual on ball tampering and how to take wickets.
How come king of ball temper (Akram) train KKR team in ball tempering. SRK should be ashamed of having Akram in KKR. Some body tell this SRK to cover up everything from all sides and sit quite.
What he is saying is right. I have seen players complaining about the poor visiblity of the ball. But umpires refuse ball change. But the question is how can the ball get dirty enough not to be visible within 20 overs when it is good in 50 overs match till 35 overs. I saw a match of DC where Simmo was complaining about the ball and lost the match, must be against RR if my memory is right.
Re: True
by Ram Shyam on Apr 17, 2010 12:59 AM
Umpire did see the ball in Symonds case and decide that ball was good. Mind you they were international umpires.. Symond couldn't see but his partner was able to bat normally.. fissy isn't it?
And Symond is saint as we all know and we all must believe in what he says and Umpires are crooks!!
